ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

© 1978 Mr. Robert Altman
[THE WET PAGE] [IORR NEWS] [SETLISTS 1962-2003] [THE A/V ROOM] [THE ART GALLERY] [MICK JAGGER] [KEITHFUCIUS] [CHARLIE WATTS ] [RON WOOD] [BRIAN JONES] [MICK TAYLOR] [BILL WYMAN] [IAN STEWART ] [NICKY HOPKINS] [MERRY CLAYTON] [IAN 'MAC' McLAGAN] [BERNARD FOWLER] [LISA FISCHER] [DARRYL JONES] [BOBBY KEYS] [JAMES PHELGE] [CHUCK LEAVELL] [LINKS] [PHOTOS] [MAGAZINE COVERS] [MUSIC COVERS ] [JIMI HENDRIX] [BOOTLEGS] [TEMPLE] [GUESTBOOK] [ADMIN]

[CHAT ROOM aka THE FUN HOUSE] [RESTROOMS]

NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
Enter artist an start searching using "Power Search" (RECOMMENDED) inside.
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:

PicoSearch
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
Register | Update Profile | F.A.Q. | Admin Control Panel

Topic: Congratulations President Bush Return to archive Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
November 3rd, 2004 05:37 PM
Poplar
JB - great post to start the thread. I thank you. I'm so proud of W, but I'm also proud of the country. The process works, and we should all take comfort in that. Here's to four years of healing, and progress in America and around the world. My best wishes to everyone that voted yesterday, regardless of how you cast your ballot. I also extend my best wishes to those around the world, regardless of you feel about the results. It's time for all of us to move ahead. Civilized society is still at war with terror, and I hope we all find the best way to win this war, for ourselves, and our posterity. God bless.

Poplar

November 3rd, 2004 05:39 PM
Scottfree
quote:
jb wrote:
That's the real me....rationale and CALM..I would never be as sucessful as I am if I was unable to get along with all types of people despite our differences....We still are one country and are blessed to be here in America.



I live in Ohio, and I voted for Bush, doesn't sound like your trying to get along with me.....The Democrats lost, because America doesn't want to turn socialist, and is tired of seeing it's own people root against them for political gain......
November 3rd, 2004 05:50 PM
stonedinaustralia
quote:
Scottfree wrote:


The Democrats lost, because America doesn't want to turn socialist,




are you serious??

socialism has been a dead issue since the Berlin wall came down - hell, even mainland china is slowly becoming part of the "western" capitalist system

and wait until it (western capitalism) really takes hold there with the absolutely huge market and pool of resouces (human and otherwise) that they have eventually (maybe not in our life-times but i'd say within the next 100 - 150 years) the centre of gravity of world politics will shift from Washington to Beijing (sp?)
November 3rd, 2004 05:50 PM
Poplar
Agreed ScottFree... that bin Laden tape was essentially the Democratic clap track, and that didn't help Kerry one iota. The tape was a pitiful attempt to swing the US vote to Kerry through intimidation. It also seemed to indicate just how powerless bin Laden has become. America's response to UBL: "Go fuck yourself, pal." Something tells me Usama's days are numbered, as well as the foreign terrorists holding up progress and Democracy in Iraq.

anyway - i don't mean to go one sided today. It's time for all of us to take a deep breath, and remember that we're all in this together, especially us Americans.

November 3rd, 2004 06:18 PM
Gazza
quote:
Scottfree wrote:

I live in Ohio, and I voted for Bush, doesn't sound like your trying to get along with me.....The Democrats lost, because America doesn't want to turn socialist, and is tired of seeing it's own people root against them for political gain......



Spoken like someone who lives in a country thats never had any concept of socialism (lucky you)

The whole idea of a party like the Democrats or a guy like Kerry (with his billionairess wife)in a country as politically conservative as the US being considered within a million miles of being "socialist" is downright laughable.
November 3rd, 2004 06:46 PM
not bound to please
quote:
sammy davis jr. wrote:
Kerrys a kept man- he 'aint gettin' any. I'll bet he's giving it to that biatch though.



Edwards has to be good for something now...

November 3rd, 2004 06:47 PM
M.O.W.A.T. Normally, if someone told me that there would be 4 more years of bush, I would be ecstatic!

With a Republican President and Republican control of both houses, watch the US take an even more drastic turn to the right.
[Edited by M.O.W.A.T.]
November 3rd, 2004 06:49 PM
caro
quote:
Scottfree wrote:
The Democrats lost, because America doesn't want to turn socialist

ROTFL!! I'll tell that to my socialist pals tomorrow, it will raise their spirits. Sometimes I really feel like Americans and Europeans live on different planets. Not to say that my planet is better than yours -- but it depresses me that we can't even agree on such basic things as the definition of "socialist".
November 3rd, 2004 06:53 PM
not bound to please
quote:
stonedinaustralia wrote:


are you serious??

socialism has been a dead issue since the Berlin wall came down - hell, even mainland china is slowly becoming part of the "western" capitalist system

and wait until it (western capitalism) really takes hold there with the absolutely huge market and pool of resouces (human and otherwise) that they have eventually (maybe not in our life-times but i'd say within the next 100 - 150 years) the centre of gravity of world politics will shift from Washington to Beijing (sp?)



Shanghi and Beijing are more capitalist than the US.

Now that Bush has won his second term - he need not pander to the crackers - his main voting block. You know there are very few rich patrician voters (the nature of capitalism...) so he could never even win prom queen appealing solely to them. He had to play the christian right wing small town un educated morons to get - and now stay - in office. It may not be as bad as you think. He may become more moderate now.

November 3rd, 2004 06:55 PM
Gazza
quote:
caro wrote:

ROTFL!! I'll tell that to my socialist pals tomorrow, it will raise their spirits. Sometimes I really feel like Americans and Europeans live on different planets. Not to say that my planet is better than yours -- but it depresses me that we can't even agree on such basic things as the definition of "socialist".



or "liberal"
November 3rd, 2004 07:00 PM
caro
quote:
Gazza wrote:
or "liberal"


Indeed. Dunno what it's like in the UK, but I get the impression that our french right-wing politicians are shamelessly taking advantage of the gap between the french and the american definition.
"-But you're turning our country into a police state!
-Huh? C'mon, we're liberals!"
November 3rd, 2004 07:12 PM
stonedinaustralia
quote:
not bound to please wrote:




Now that Bush has won his second term - he need not pander to the crackers - his main voting block. You know there are very few rich patrician voters (the nature of capitalism...) so he could never even win prom queen appealing solely to them. He had to play the christian right wing small town un educated morons to get - and now stay - in office. It may not be as bad as you think. He may become more moderate now.






but isn't he "one of them" himself (albeit a wealthy version) -

you maybe right 'tho, having hauled himself into a second term with an aggresive "war time presidient" stance he may attempt to bow out on a moderate note in order to have history judge him a "statesman" like figure

speaking as someone on the "inside" how do you see him moderating his positions and do you think he actually makes the call on these things?? - isn't it the faceless "back-room" boys who are actually setting the agenda and calling the shots?

cheers, my dear

November 3rd, 2004 07:25 PM
not bound to please
quote:
stonedinaustralia wrote:



but isn't he "one of them" himself (albeit a wealthy version) -

you maybe right 'tho, having hauled himself into a second term with an aggresive "war time presidient" stance he may attempt to bow out on a moderate note in order to have history judge him a "statesman" like figure

speaking as someone on the "inside" how do you see him moderating his positions and do you think he actually makes the call on these things?? - isn't it the faceless "back-room" boys who are actually setting the agenda and calling the shots?

cheers, my dear





He plays the good old boy. He isn't the brightest bulb - no doubt, as are many rich kids - but he ain't no cracker. He's a figurehead, a spokesmodel. Besides Arsecroft, the guys in control are pretty damn well educated, rational (whether you agree with them or not) and NOT fundamentalist christian nutbags. The class system is actually more complex in America than in England in many ways - because most of the country is in denial of it.

I'm not giving up hope.

Call me Pollyanna...



November 3rd, 2004 07:35 PM
gypsy This thread has become what I predicted it would.
I am now boycotting it.
November 3rd, 2004 07:39 PM
icydanger

Post partum despression reading born again bitches.


poor US
November 3rd, 2004 07:45 PM
stonedinaustralia
quote:
not bound to please wrote:


Call me Pollyanna...








hey Polly


>He plays the good old boy. He isn't the brightest bulb - no doubt, as are many rich kids - but he ain't no cracker. He's a figurehead, a spokesmodel.

i know what you mean and having seen him perform over the last few months he's clearly getting good advice as to how to "play the crowd" and was very adept in his "performance"

it's certainly disheartening 'tho see that one of Kerry's "negatives" is that he was considered too intelligent - this "dumbing down" of the level of debate really drives me nuts but then I'm an over-educated type who also probably thinks too much


>Besides Arsecroft, the guys in control are pretty damn well educated, rational (whether you agree with them or not) and NOT fundamentalist christian nutbags.

well that's something to take encouragement from



>The class system is actually more complex in America than in England in many ways - because most of the country is in denial of it.

that's a very interesting comment and I'd like to hear more of what you have to say on the topic - if you find yourself with time on your hands send us a PM or email - thanks





November 3rd, 2004 07:48 PM
not bound to please
quote:
stonedinaustralia wrote:



hey Polly


>He plays the good old boy. He isn't the brightest bulb - no doubt, as are many rich kids - but he ain't no cracker. He's a figurehead, a spokesmodel.

i know what you mean and having seen him perform over the last few months he's clearly getting good advice as to how to "play the crowd" and was very adept in his "performance"

it's certainly disheartening 'tho see that one of Kerry's "negatives" is that he was considered too intelligent - this "dumbing down" of the level of debate really drives me nuts but then I'm an over-educated type who also probably thinks too much


>Besides Arsecroft, the guys in control are pretty damn well educated, rational (whether you agree with them or not) and NOT fundamentalist christian nutbags.

well that's something to take encouragement from



>The class system is actually more complex in America than in England in many ways - because most of the country is in denial of it.

that's a very interesting comment and I'd like to hear more of what you have to say on the topic - if you find yourself with time on your hands send us a PM or email - thanks









I shall, sometime tomorrow...

in the meanwhile...:




[Edited by not bound to please]
November 3rd, 2004 08:08 PM
stonedinaustralia thanks - i'll look forward to it
November 3rd, 2004 08:16 PM
iluvmickjagger07 im not political at all but i did want kerry to win. i dont why.... i guess because hes seems more peaceful and hes a democrat. plus bush sucks because he started the war in iraq and im sick of looking at his face. but hes a good guy
November 3rd, 2004 08:34 PM
mickjaggersgrl
quote:
iluvmickjagger07 wrote:
im not political at all but i did want kerry to win. i dont why.... i guess because hes seems more peaceful and hes a democrat. plus bush sucks because he started the war in iraq and im sick of looking at his face. but hes a good guy



well i was going for bush but really it dosnt matter to us we both arnt old enough to vote anyways
November 3rd, 2004 08:37 PM
Taptrick

The United States of Canada? What if Atlas Shrugged?



~
November 3rd, 2004 08:42 PM
doo doo doo Dude


November 3rd, 2004 08:53 PM
Taptrick

There's winning ugly and loosing ugly ....behold loosing ugly on this thread.


~
November 3rd, 2004 08:56 PM
gypsy Losing ugly indeed. Bush is our President...quit whining about it and get used to it.
November 3rd, 2004 09:16 PM
Scot Rocks Im worried, Kerry was the lesser of the two evils - at least he wanted to curtail some of the Patriot Act - and now the world seems such a dangerous place. Civil liberties ripped apart, more wars, more peoples lives ruined, more fear and hatred.


"These days, its all secrecy and no privacy...
Good night sleep tight"



Mark
November 3rd, 2004 09:18 PM
Some Guy Rodham-Clinton in 08!
November 3rd, 2004 09:18 PM
Taptrick
Interesting trend below. This is from 2000. Red counties are Republican and blue counties are Democrat. Once the 2004 map comes out we will see 96% red counties. I'm trying to post the image but it might only show as the link. Le'see:

November 3rd, 2004 09:43 PM
Mr Hess "Canada, or as I call it, America Jr."-Homer Simpson
November 3rd, 2004 10:26 PM
Poplar
quote:
gypsy wrote:
Losing ugly indeed. Bush is our President...quit whining about it and get used to it.



Amen sister, amen.

Message to those of you that are upset: Being a snotty-nosed, panty-in-a-wad, no-hand-shaking, pouty-faced loser IS NOT flattering.

November 3rd, 2004 10:48 PM
Ursus*Horribilis Four more years, four more years ... of environmental destruction. http://www.monsterslash.org/
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8