| October 4th, 2005 02:44 AM |
|
|
| stonedinaustralia |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
I have no problem with people bagging on the Crowes. They're a unique band.
wooahh St Sway now your really pushing the bounds of credibility...
unique?!?!...i would have thought that there would be at least half a dozen bands that fit the Crowes profile (stones wannabe's trading on the licks, sounds and looks of the stones from the 60s/70s)in every city in the western world |
| October 4th, 2005 03:19 AM |
|
|
| pdog |
The Kings Of Leon are way better than The Black Crowes! |
| October 4th, 2005 04:13 AM |
|
|
| wisertime |
quote:
pdog wrote:
The Kings Of Leon are way better than The Black Crowes!
LOL  |
| October 4th, 2005 05:33 AM |
|
|
| Jumacfly |
I got a question Saint Sway : isn t there a Crowes board, somewhere, where you could express your love for the band??
I mean, it could be better for you, you could find people that share your passion??
|
| October 4th, 2005 06:08 AM |
|
|
| egon |
jumy?! is that you? |
| October 4th, 2005 06:53 AM |
|
|
| Nellcote |
Blooze, actually, that was 1/3 of my bbq Sunday.
The rub I used was from Salt Lick, in Driftwood.
That rub was good enough to stand on it's own.
The second rub from Stubbs, along with Stubbs Moppin Sauce.
My buddy who lives near Round Rock tells me some rub from Cooper's is on the way to me, you been there?
The final rub was Char Crust Hickory~Molasses, with Jack Daniels BBQ sauce for finish.
It was a regular hoedown warmup Sunday for the big tailgate party at the hacienda in November.
I actually used some Rudy's earlier in the week, still near the best..
Riffy, you are four-four by my count.
Keep on Smilin Bro!
|
| October 4th, 2005 07:05 AM |
|
|
| White House Lawn |
Who are The Black Crows? |
| October 4th, 2005 07:09 AM |
|
|
| Jumacfly |
quote:
egon wrote:
jumy?! is that you?
yes bro!!
I was on holidays last week, just have your emails this morning!!
fuck, i ve missed the RO shirt alert, that sucks!!
cheers mon pote
Ju |
| October 4th, 2005 07:10 AM |
|
|
| ListenToTheLion |
The Black Crowes are totally passé. After two (very) good albums (Moneymaker and Southern Harmony) they sunk to a very low level. They are not interesting anymore for many years now. Completely washed out and outdated. |
| October 4th, 2005 07:12 AM |
|
|
| Jumacfly |
quote:
ListenToTheLion wrote:
The Black Crowes are totally passé. After two (very) good albums (Moneymaker and Southern Harmony) they sunk to a very low level. They are not interesting anymore for many years now. Completely washed out and outdated.
Hi LTTL!
I haven't left the board,it's good to be back  !
|
| October 4th, 2005 07:20 AM |
|
|
| ListenToTheLion |
quote:
Jumacfly wrote:
Hi LTTL!
I haven't left the board,it's good to be back !
welcome back man, I am certain you know the difference between a crow and a lion. |
| October 4th, 2005 09:32 AM |
|
|
| 2000 Man |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
I have no problem with people bagging on the Crowes. They're a unique band.
How are they unique? In that they came of age when there was an Internets so that their small cult following can actually feel like they aren't the only one in town that cares about them? I mean, you don't think their sound or anything is "unique," do you?
You Black Crowes fans are funny. You rave about a band that's been essentially a mediocre jam band their entire existence, but if the Stones don't recreate Exile on Main St. every night you slag them. How pathetic is that? |
| October 4th, 2005 10:02 AM |
|
|
| time is on my side |
quote:
Jumacfly wrote:
I got a question Saint Sway : isn t there a Crowes board, somewhere, where you could express your love for the band??
I mean, it could be better for you, you could find people that share your passion??
I'm not one to kick a man when he's down but, what the hell, I thought I would take this TIME to join in on some of the fun.
This is the same question I posed to Saint Sway a few months ago. Personally, I have no problem with his beliefs which seem to center around the fact that the CROWES are currently able to do the STONES better, in album and in concert, than what the latter day version of the STONE themselves are able to do musically in the here and now.
Everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and everyone has different taste when it comes to music.
As a fan of the CROWES myself (I've seen them over a dozen times in concert), I find them to be an entertaining band but, as I've said many tmes already, they simply are not in the same league with the STONES. It's like comparing a minor league team to a team in the bigs.
Sure that's my belief (the CROWES being minor league when compared to the STONES) but this is a message board that is devoted to the ROLLING STONES. Is it surprising that I and others have a passion when it comes to the STONES??? That I and others will never share this idea of the BLACK CROWES as the saviours of rock and roll.
That is why they have different message boards for different groups so people can share similiar passions. When someone comes to a ROLLING STONES message board and is constantly negative towards them then praises another group (any group) as being so much better, people will slam you in the same way if I went on to the Black Crowes.com message board and constantly posted that the CROWES were a washed up piece of shit. What do think their reaction would be???
[Edited by time is on my side] |
| October 4th, 2005 10:59 AM |
|
|
| Saint Sway |
quote:
Riffhard wrote:
However,I would never argue it with you if you ever said anything nice about the band that this site is dedicated to.
Riffhard
of course you wouldn't
that about sums it up right there.
lets all write happy thoughts about the Stones and hold hands together |
| October 4th, 2005 11:17 AM |
|
|
| Jumacfly |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
of course you wouldn't
that about sums it up right there.
lets all write happy thoughts about the Stones and hold hands together
Don t you think there's a difference between having an opinion and bashing a band in everything you post?
|
| October 4th, 2005 11:19 AM |
|
|
| White House Lawn |
>>of course you wouldn't
that about sums it up right there.
lets all write happy thoughts about the Stones and hold hands together<<
That's a great idea! While we do the above, you can go suck Crowe Cock on a Black Crowes' message board!
Or can they even AFFORD one? |
| October 4th, 2005 01:20 PM |
|
|
| ListenToTheLion |
Comparing the Crows with the Stones is pure blasphemy! Crows are third rate. |
| October 4th, 2005 01:26 PM |
|
|
| Saint Sway |
quote:
ListenToTheLion wrote:
After two (very) good albums (Moneymaker and Southern Harmony) they sunk to a very low level. They are not interesting anymore for many years now. Completely washed out and outdated.
are you sure you arent actually talking about the last 20-something years of the Stones career? |
| October 4th, 2005 01:32 PM |
|
|
| telecaster |
quote:
ListenToTheLion wrote:
The Black Crowes are totally passé. After two (very) good albums (Moneymaker and Southern Harmony) they sunk to a very low level. They are not interesting anymore for many years now. Completely washed out and outdated.
Preach it
They were GREAT for two months in what, 91 or 92
Next up for the Crowes:
County Fairs, childrens birthday parties and convenience store openings
A once decent band that couldn't even handle moderate success
Sad because they were good for those couple of months 14 yrs ago
|
| October 4th, 2005 01:36 PM |
|
|
| Saint Sway |
tele,
you know not of what you speak.
go see them. It'll change your comments. They are only about 1000x better now than they were then.
they are so good its scary |
| October 4th, 2005 01:49 PM |
|
|
| ListenToTheLion |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
are you sure you arent actually talking about the last 20-something years of the Stones career?
Yes, with the exception of A Bigger Bang. |
| October 4th, 2005 01:57 PM |
|
|
| Dan |
I would rather see Rich Robinson performing a solo "Memo From Turner" in a Black Crowes Relief benefit concert. |
| October 4th, 2005 02:01 PM |
|
|
| telecaster |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
tele,
you know not of what you speak.
go see them. It'll change your comments. They are only about 1000x better now than they were then.
they are so good its scary
Sway which shows of the Stones have you seen this tour? |
| October 4th, 2005 02:04 PM |
|
|
| Joey |
" Preach it
They were GREAT for two months in what, 91 or 92"
 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Scuzzy
|
| October 4th, 2005 02:05 PM |
|
|
| Dan |
quote:
They were GREAT for two months in what, 91 or 92"
Actually it was December 1990 and January 1991. |
| October 4th, 2005 03:01 PM |
|
|
| monkey_man |
quote:
pdog wrote:
The Kings Of Leon are way better than The Black Crowes!
PDog what have you been smoking? The Kings of Leon are third rate at best; the Black Crowes are second rate! |
| October 4th, 2005 03:09 PM |
|
|
| Saint Sway |
quote:
telecaster wrote:
Sway which shows of the Stones have you seen this tour?
I saw the Lincoln Center press conference performance, the Toronto club show at the Pheonix, Hartford, MSG, Giants Stadium and Albany.
most likely going to hold off on seeing any others until MSG & Fleet Center in Boston.
how about you?
|
| October 4th, 2005 03:12 PM |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
I saw the Lincoln Center press conference performance, the Toronto club show at the Pheonix, Hartford, MSG, Giants Stadium and Albany.
And you weren't greeted once! |
| October 4th, 2005 03:15 PM |
|
|
| Saint Sway |
does Blondie count? |
| October 4th, 2005 03:19 PM |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
does Blondie count?
When he watches Seasame Street I heard he does very well counting and singing the alphabet song!
You however will not be with the "A" list posters in NYC in 2006!
We will have:
Lawyers
Hit Men
Slots
You will have:
Loser jam band loving hippies
Bad weed
Crack Ho's
|
