|
|
| Dan |
All the Neocons were apparently backing McCain for president about ten years ago. |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Fiji Joe wrote:
The economy is in much better shape than it was when I was growing up...and it will take a lot to make it worse...if my wants were as reasonable as those of my parents, I would have no worries...but, like everyone else, I'm greedy...I don't have a lot of sympathy for government employees bitching that they're going to lose their $400,000 home...Now, if they were bitching about losing their $125,000 home, I'd have some concern
Isn't the real problem that it is the same home, they paid 400k for and it's now valued at 125k and that no interest loan is not such a great idea now? Hello HSCB Bank, we got another default. |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Dan wrote:
All the Neocons were apparently backing McCain for president about ten years ago.
Wasn't McCain still to young to collect SS benefits then? |
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
Dan wrote:
All the Neocons were apparently backing McCain for president about ten years ago.
True...McCain marks the first president to run on the 100 more years of war platform...He also stands a chance of being the first presidential nominee to lose to a black man, a woman or both...If that happens, he can expect a lot of snickering behind his back at the country club
 |
|
|
| Joey |
" ...If that happens, he can expect a lot of snickering behind his back at the country club "
|
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
pdog wrote:
Isn't the real problem that it is the same home, they paid 400k for and it's now valued at 125k and that no interest loan is not such a great idea now? Hello HSCB Bank, we got another default.
No...that's not the problem at all...you gonna tell me you don't know tons of people who got in way over their head on their homes?...Who agreed to loans that if they had thought about at all, they wouldn't have taken?...I sure as hell do...It didn't take Greenspan to see this coming...The damn of it is...I have the sneaking suspiscion that I'm going to have to pay my money to help these retards keep their homes...Thanks retards...and fuck you retards |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Fiji Joe wrote:
No...that's not the problem at all...you gonna tell me you don't know tons of people who got in way over their head on their homes?...Who agreed to loans that if they had thought about at all, they wouldn't have taken?...I sure as hell do...It didn't take Greenspan to see this coming...The damn of it is...I have the sneaking suspiscion that I'm going to have to pay my money to help these retards keep their homes...Thanks retards...and fuck you retards
No, I don't personally know alot of those types, b/c the housing market here isn't as volitile. BUT!!! We passed on doing this, knowing the risks, and now in the next two years should be able to buy a home, in a place like Austin, if we move there, for a mageable price and a low monthly mortgage.... thanks retards! |
|
|
| Starbuck |
quote:
have to pay my money to help these retards keep their homes...
yes, i will run on a "no retards" platform. this means joey and TTM will be forced out. pug is already gone, so i know the system is working.
"Yes, we ban!" |
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
pdog wrote:
No, I don't personally know alot of those types, b/c the housing market here isn't as volitile. BUT!!! We passed on doing this, knowing the risks, and now in the next two years should be able to buy a home, in a place like Austin, if we move there, for a mageable price and a low monthly mortgage.... thanks retards!
Absolutely...my experience was similar...I watched people making half of what I was, moving into homes worth twice as much as the one I was living in, with two or three new cars in the driveway...none of this surprises me...if people have 30 or 40 K to throw down on a home now, they'll make bank in a few years...
|
|
|
| Starbuck |
the people are definitely retards...that is a question not up for debate.
however, what happens if we don't bail the retards out? or, more accurately, bail out the banks that lent the retards money? |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Starbuck wrote:
yes, i will run on a "no retards" platform. this means joey and TTM will be forced out. pug is already gone, so i know the system is working.
"Yes, we ban!"
Here it is folks, the liberal authoritarian you hear so much about!!! |
|
|
| monkey_man |
quote:
Starbuck wrote:
however, what happens if we don't bail the retards out? or, more accurately, bail out the banks that lent the retards money?
Folks that are shorting the hell out of this market are gonna get filthy rich. . .fuck the bailouts! |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
monkey_man wrote:
Folks that are shorting the hell out of this market are gonna get filthy rich. . .fuck the bailouts!
Word... This could be my big chance to get rich... I gotta drive home and tell Wilma!!!
|
|
|
| Dan |
quote:
Fiji Joe wrote:
No...that's not the problem at all...you gonna tell me you don't know tons of people who got in way over their head on their homes?...Who agreed to loans that if they had thought about at all, they wouldn't have taken?...I sure as hell do...It didn't take Greenspan to see this coming...The damn of it is...I have the sneaking suspiscion that I'm going to have to pay my money to help these retards keep their homes...Thanks retards...and fuck you retards
I remember 5 years ago or more, my mom telling me all her co-workers are eventually going to lose their houses, and now it's happening. |
|
|
| pdog |
Now that the retard-in-chief has endorsed the older-than-dirt guy, will the geeks be unified?
|
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
pdog wrote:
Now that the retard-in-chief has endorsed the older-than-dirt guy, will the geeks be unified?
Let's not get too excited about McCain...Don't forget...this is the man who lost to the retard...and is about to get endorsed by the retard...and by all accounts, including his own, is running on a platform of 4 more years of retard |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Fiji Joe wrote:
Let's not get too excited about McCain...Don't forget...this is the man who lost to the retard...and is about to get endorsed by the retard...and by all accounts, including his own, is running on a platform of 4 more years of retard
Are you calling him McSame? |
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
pdog wrote:
Are you calling him McSame?
Yes...Only more McTarded |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Fiji Joe wrote:
Yes...Only more McTarded
McSame
McTarded
McRINO
Hello President _________ (insert nigger or bitch) ! |
|
|
| monkey_man |
quote:
pdog wrote:
McSame
McTarded
McRINO
Hello President _________ (insert nigger or bitch) !
Hello President, Patsy Fall-Person
[Edited by monkey_man] |
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
monkey_man wrote:
Hello President, Patsy Fall-Person
[Edited by monkey_man]
It all has the real conservatives licking their chops for 2012
|
|
|
| Starbuck |
feej...your political commentary as of late is much more rational, anti bush and therefore sane. what gives? has fleabit discovered your password? |
|
|
| Fiji Joe |
quote:
Starbuck wrote:
feej...your political commentary as of late is much more rational, anti bush and therefore sane. what gives? has fleabit discovered your password?
Don't confuse my pointing out the very obvious shortcomings of the zionist controlled McCain as an endorsement of the alternatives...the alternatives, as it relates to the key issues, are worse...much much worse...and you will see this should they prevail...and I would have to know nothing of their ability to accomplish what they speak of to make this statement...they very well may do just that...that isn't the problem in this election...the problem isn't candidates delivering on the issues they speak of...the problem is the issues they do not speak of...such solidarity between parties to not speak of these issues should concern you...but that assumes you yourself have some notion as to what the key issues are...you haven't shown many anything in that regard |
|
|
| Starbuck |
quote:
but that assumes you yourself have some notion as to what the key issues are...you haven't shown many anything in that regard
indeed...i am too busy teaching and rocking to pay attention to the race right now...my current lifestyle (correcting, taking away ipods/cellphones, doing lines in the bathroom at "stub and herbs" with various members of the minneapolis chapter of the hell's angels) leaves me little time for current events.
i will save the homework for the general election.
|
|
|
| Riffhard |
quote:
Starbuck wrote:
indeed...i am too busy teaching and rocking to pay attention to the race right now...my current lifestyle (correcting, taking away ipods/cellphones, doing lines in the bathroom at "stub and herbs" with various members of the minneapolis chapter of the hell's angels) leaves me little time for current events.
i will save the homework for the general election.
Well perhaps I can save you a little trouble on that front. So far Hillary has propossed roughly 900 hundred billion in new spending. Obama has propossed roughly 980 billion in new spending. To date neither has mentioned anything with regards to how they plan on paying for any of this.
Unless, of course, you consider "taxing the rich" as some kind of magic bullet. The fact that "taxing the rich" always leads, and I do mean always leads, to taxing everyone. This fact dosen't seem to bother the uninformed amoung us. If you think that Bill Clinton's largest tax hike in the history of the USA was something,.....well,....you ain't seen nothing yet! Should one of these Marxists get into the WH we are all screwed, rich and poor alike.
Riffy
[Edited by Riffhard] |
|
|
| sirmoonie |
quote:
Riffhard wrote:
Well perhaps I can save you a little trouble on that front. So far Hillary has propossed roughly 900 hundred billion in new spending. Obama has propossed roughly 980 billion in new spending. To date neither has mentioned anything with regards to how they plan on paying for any of this.
If the last 7 years have taught us anything, it's that it doesn't matter one bit how much a president and his administration spends of the taxpayers' hard earned $$$$$. Furthermore, the last 7 years have taught us, a president and his administration don't even need to mention anything with regards to how they plan on paying for any of it. In fact, the last 7 years have taught us, if someone else suggests that they should have a plan, and are crazy enough to propose one, they get labeled a RINO or a liberal or some other term.
Such decisions were made long ago, and can't be changed now for the sake of geekism. Well, they can, but its disingenuous. It might even be gay. |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
Riffhard wrote:
Well perhaps I can save you a little trouble on that front. So far Hillary has propossed roughly 900 hundred billion in new spending. Obama has propossed roughly 980 billion in new spending. To date neither has mentioned anything with regards to how they plan on paying for any of this.
Unless, of course, you consider "taxing the rich" as some kind of magic bullet. The fact that "taxing the rich" always leads, and I do mean always leads, to taxing everyone. This fact dosen't seem to bother the uninformed amoung us. If you think that Bill Clinton's largest tax hike in the history of the USA was something,.....well,....you ain't seen nothing yet! Should one of these Marxists get into the WH we are all screwed, rich and poor alike.
Riffy
[Edited by Riffhard]
Those numbers aren't big, considering the war in Iraq costs $275 million per day. Do you know what that costs breaks down to, to every household in America a day... way more than helathcare and education... for me it is an ends justifying the means. Seriously, you get your war, I get healthcare and education... fuck it, it's only money! If our kids are worth it, then our kids are WORTH it, right? |
|
|
| Riffhard |
quote:
sirmoonie wrote:
If the last 7 years have taught us anything, it's that it doesn't matter one bit how much a president and his administration spends of the taxpayers' hard earned $$$$$. Furthermore, the last 7 years have taught us, a president and his administration don't even need to mention anything with regards to how they plan on paying for any of it. In fact, the last 7 years have taught us, if someone else suggests that they should have a plan, and are crazy enough to propose one, they get labeled a RINO or a liberal or some other term.
Such decisions were made long ago, and can't be changed now for the sake of geekism. Well, they can, but its disingenuous. It might even be gay.
So true! I mean why would anyone call a guy a RINO just because he thumbs his nose at the entire conservative base on issues like illegal immigration,tax cuts,nonsensical bullshit global warming conspiracy theories,shutting down Gitmo,slamming waterboarding even though it has saved lives by the hundreds,teams up with the likes of those other conservatives like Kerry,Kennedy,Feingold on bullshit law,...... I mean how can anyone call this man a RINO?
I mean it all seems so obvious when you throw your moonie speak into the equation! Thanks Moonie!
Riffy |
|
|
| robpop |
Some say if Obama gets the nomination he will get wacked. Take him on the death pool. |
|
|
| sirmoonie |
quote:
Riffhard wrote:
So true! I mean why would anyone call a guy a RINO just because he thumbs his nose at the entire conservative base on issues like illegal immigration,tax cuts,nonsensical bullshit global warming conspiracy theories,shutting down Gitmo,slamming waterboarding even though it has saved lives by the hundreds,teams up with the likes of those other conservatives like Kerry,Kennedy,Feingold on bullshit law,...... I mean how can anyone call this man a RINO?
I mean it all seems so obvious when you throw your moonie speak into the equation! Thanks Moonie!
Riffy
No. Holy Marigold, no.
Back up. Try to think chronologically.
Read what you wrote first. Think about the wayward point you tried to express.
Then read what I wrote second. Assume it was a response to what you wrote first.
Then read what you wrote third. Read it in slow motion. See? See where that went? You threw a mormball and didn't even know it.
Okay now, try again. Get closer to the keyboard if you need to. |
|
