| February 24th, 2005 10:35 PM |
|
|
| Scottfree |
See subject line (yep that is what I said) No further text.... |
| February 24th, 2005 11:25 PM |
|
|
| VoodooChileInWOnderl |
Oh ahhh...
Mathematically correct 78 > 72
Tour related both are some of the best ever 78 = 72 |
| February 24th, 2005 11:42 PM |
|
|
| mac_daddy |
big fan of some of the 78 stuff, but 72 is THE tour imho. |
| February 24th, 2005 11:45 PM |
|
|
| VoodooChileInWOnderl |
Then 72 > 78  |
| February 25th, 2005 05:22 PM |
|
|
| time is on my side |
73>72>78 |
| February 25th, 2005 08:25 PM |
|
|
| littleredrooster |
72 MUCH> 78
In fact, 78 should be moved from the 70/s and banished to the 80's |
| February 25th, 2005 09:26 PM |
|
|
| SirMuddy |
Little red rooster: 78 should be moved from the 70/s and banished to the 80's...
That's why we said the stones are ahead of their time
Tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiime is on my side
for one week...
Jah bless you all! |