ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

RCA Studios. Los Ángeles, CA - May 18, 1965
© 2002
[THE WET PAGE] [IORR NEWS] [SETLISTS 1962-2003] [THE A/V ROOM] [THE ART GALLERY] [MICK JAGGER] [KEITHFUCIUS] [CHARLIE WATTS ] [RON WOOD] [BRIAN JONES] [MICK TAYLOR] [BILL WYMAN] [IAN STEWART ] [NICKY HOPKINS] [MERRY CLAYTON] [IAN 'MAC' McLAGAN] [BERNARD FOWLER] [LISA FISCHER] [DARRYL JONES] [BOBBY KEYS] [JAMES PHELGE] [CHUCK LEAVELL] [LINKS] [PHOTOS] [MAGAZINE COVERS] [MUSIC COVERS ] [JIMI HENDRIX] [BOOTLEGS] [TEMPLE] [GUESTBOOK] [ADMIN]

[CHAT ROOM aka THE FUN HOUSE] [RESTROOMS]

NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
Enter artist an start searching using "Power Search" (RECOMMENDED) inside.
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:

PicoSearch
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
Register | Update Profile | F.A.Q. | Admin Control Panel

Topic: Are the Stones a pretty boy band? Return to archive
12-26-03 04:29 PM
morocco Sure, you can make a lot of claims about the writing and musicianship of the rock and Rolling Stones. But the fact remains that in the 60's, Jones, Jagger,and Richards were the best looking guys in the world.

Would they have been as successful if they all looked like Ernest Borgnine? No, Stones fans, they wouldn't.

How many great writers and musicians, even on this message board, have been passed up simply because they didn't have the sex appeal and charisma of a Mick Jagger or a Brian Jones?

I'm not complaining or criticizing. I'm simply saying that's how the world works and you know it.

12-26-03 05:00 PM
SHINE A LIGHT the questions i asked you are in YOUR "archives" thread.
12-26-03 05:27 PM
morocco
quote:
SHINE A LIGHT wrote:
the questions i asked you are in YOUR "archives" thread.



Found 'em, answered them. Thanks.
12-26-03 06:08 PM
beer you're right. if the stones were midgets, they would never have been as big as they are today.

12-26-03 07:03 PM
Monkey Woman
quote:
Are the Stones a pretty boy band?

Is morocco a compulsive thread starter?
12-26-03 07:27 PM
Mr. D All he is is a curious stones beginner whom wants to know all he can. We should be glad he's asking us.
12-26-03 07:37 PM
Monkey Woman
quote:
Mr. D wrote:
All he is is a curious stones beginner whom wants to know all he can. We should be glad he's asking us.


Oh, we are mightily honored!
Jokes apart, I do get your point, Mr. D. But I cannot help thinking that anyone in that position could greatly benefit from: 1) lots of Google search, 2) reading the forum archives & 3) thinking things over a little after reading answers instead of posting immediately another question.
I encourage wholehartedly anyone who enjoys the Stones and wants to learn more about them, but there nothing like personal research when you want to build knowledge. Time will tell!
12-26-03 08:51 PM
KeithRichards210
quote:
beer wrote:
you're right. if the stones were midgets, they would never have been as big as they are today.





LMFAO!!! Nice one, Beer...
Really though, eye appeal does figure into one's popularity. And I'm sure it didn't hurt the Stones. Very unique looking people, and in the case of the three mentioned, babe magnets.
12-26-03 11:52 PM
Zack Stu did kind of look like Ernest Borgnine. Then there's the chick interviewed in 25x5 (which Morocco should also watch before he starts another thread) who said "Keith's so ugly he's beautiful."
12-27-03 07:03 AM
Honky Tonk Man Well they are certainly not a pretty boy band now!

They were never pitched as one. They were promoted as the rebellious, screw you band. The Beatles were the ultimate boy band. Smart suits, well groomed... it goes on.

Rebelliousness can be sexy and I think that’s what got so many girls hooked on the Stones.

Alex
12-27-03 09:44 AM
Lambchop If you guys really want to talk Stones instead of flaming Morocco - then this topic ALONE should spark days of debate. But I know better....

Good work!