| 20th November 2007 04:48 PM |
|
|
| steel driving hammer |
I think maybe. |
| 20th November 2007 04:50 PM |
|
|
| gimmekeef |
Not officially as that club is only 4...In terms of sort of next in line I would say Daryl..then Chuck and Bobby but it will never expand past 4 now.... |
| 20th November 2007 04:52 PM |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
steel driving hammer wrote:
I think maybe.
Are you saying you find him appealing or want to have sex with him?  |
| 20th November 2007 04:54 PM |
|
|
| steel driving hammer |
Ok, enoughs enough.
I think that fat bastard deserves to be a Stone.
Chuck still has alot of work to do.
|
| 20th November 2007 05:03 PM |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
steel driving hammer wrote:
Ok, enoughs enough.
I think that fat bastard deserves to be a Stone.
Chuck still has alot of work to do.
I agree, Bobby and Stu are both Stones in my mind!
If you get weirded out by the gay feelings, they have gay rehabs...
|
| 20th November 2007 05:10 PM |
|
|
| gypsy |
I'd say yes, Bobby Keys is a Stone. |
| 20th November 2007 05:16 PM |
|
|
| steel driving hammer |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
I'd say yes, Bobby Keys is a Stone.
Yeah I would too babe.
Wanna fuck? |
| 20th November 2007 05:31 PM |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
steel driving hammer wrote:
Yeah I would too babe.
Wanna fuck?
You don't beat around the bush, do you? |
| 20th November 2007 05:34 PM |
|
|
| pdog |
Oh my god, like ten crass comments went through my mind from the last two posts...
what is happening to me...? |
| 20th November 2007 06:02 PM |
|
|
| andrews27 |
I miss Nicky Hopkins, underappreciated on Goats Head Soup (Angie, Comin' Down Again). He's an important influence on the sound of 60s-into-70s records.
[Edited by andrews27] |
| 20th November 2007 06:33 PM |
|
|
| texile |
yes |
| 20th November 2007 06:42 PM |
|
|
| Gazza |
quote:
steel driving hammer wrote:
I think maybe.
Dont be silly.
If theres a 5th 'unofficial' Stone these days, its a Canadian with a beard who isnt even a musician. |
| 20th November 2007 06:42 PM |
|
|
| fireontheplatter |
listen to the second half of cyhmk...that should answer your question.
in my world, he has been a member ever since that song came out. |
| 20th November 2007 06:45 PM |
|
|
| Joey |
quote:
Gazza wrote:
Dont be silly.
If theres a 5th 'unofficial' Stone these days, its a Canadian with a beard who isnt even a musician.
Gazza ...........................
That is what my friends and myself call " Brazen Head Postin' " !!!!!!
You are POSTIN' !!!!!
JJJJJJJACKY !
|
| 20th November 2007 06:46 PM |
|
|
| Gazza |
quote:
fireontheplatter wrote:
listen to the second half of cyhmk...that should answer your question.
in my world, he has been a member ever since that song came out.
What - even during the 16 year spell in between when they dropped him? |
| 20th November 2007 06:48 PM |
|
|
| Gazza |
quote:
Joey wrote:
Gazza ...........................
That is what my friends and myself call " Brazen Head Postin' " !!!!!!
You are POSTIN' !!!!!
JJJJJJJACKY !
I'm deadly serious. If anything, the Stones these days are driven primarily by Jagger and Cohl, IMO |
| 20th November 2007 06:52 PM |
|
|
| fireontheplatter |
quote:
Gazza wrote:
What - even during the 16 year spell in between when they dropped him?
yes, i think so...otherwise he wouldn't have been asked/invited back.
bobby is the real big man |
| 20th November 2007 06:57 PM |
|
|
| Gazza |
Thats a good deal. Being a Stone and not being used by the band on the road for a decade and a half and when you DO play, they use you for about a third of the show.
Meanwhile, Leavell has been a permanent fixture now for 25 years. He's actually onstage more than Jagger is. Guess he's a Stone too. 
[Edited by Gazza] |
| 20th November 2007 07:07 PM |
|
|
| Bloozehound |
Keys has always been a Stone |
| 20th November 2007 08:22 PM |
|
|
| gimmekeef |
Keith..Mick.. Charlie.....Thats it...Ronnie and the rest |
| 21st November 2007 09:07 AM |
|
|
| Joey |
quote:
Gazza wrote:
I'm deadly serious. If anything, the Stones these days are driven primarily by Jagger and Cohl, IMO
What about Charlie Watts ?!
I do not believe Keith could live / play without him ........
Discuss .......
|
| 21st November 2007 11:58 AM |
|
|
| Fuck! |
to me he is a rolling stone, he's just as old as keith is, he's done just as much drugs as keith did and he makes the stones sound the stones with his great sound and playing, without Bobby, Bitch, CYHMN, live with me and brown sugar would sound awful! bobby is a great guy with a stones attitude... he's a great guy, i met him a few times in Amsterdam...
Fuck! |
| 21st November 2007 07:02 PM |
|
|
| Jaggedblues |
I'd say Bobby is absolutely as much of a Stone as one can possibly be without being an official member.
It would never happen in a million years but if the band were to ever dump all the backups they'd sure as hell still keep Bobby. Yeah he's a Stone. |
| 22nd November 2007 03:57 AM |
|
|
| corgi37 |
Bobby is as much a Stone as Ollie Brown. |
| 22nd November 2007 08:15 PM |
|
|
| real wild child |
Bobby is NOT a Stone,I agree he was around the time the Stones were at their best but donīt get confused not because now itīs the only survivor (for an outsider musician) of that period he can be considered as a member.69-73 was his best time in the group and the only "recent" work for the Stones is to play Brown Sugar and Tumbling Dice for the last 25 years.Only Stu and Nicky Hopkins can be considered members for their influence and their amazing performances on records and concerts.Actually,I think Chuck or even Darryl are the logical "member" option. |
| 23rd November 2007 07:11 AM |
|
|
| Honky Tonk Man |
I don't even see the point of his discussion. Mick, Keith, Charlie and Ronnie are The Rolling Stones. Everyone else on stage are sidemen, no matter how great their contribution may be. |
| 23rd November 2007 07:21 AM |
|
|
| charlotte |
gee gazza...mick has to take a piss break...and what a good time for it, when about 14,000 do also |
| 23rd November 2007 08:22 AM |
|
|
| guitarman53 |
To me, being A Rolling Stone is being a member of the group, one of the 5 guys, when Mick Taylor left, before Ronnie, they were looking at Harvey Mandel, Wayne Perkins, Jeff Beck & believe it or not, Leslie West, he (Leslie) mentioned that he certainly was no skinny guy to be in The Stones, Image was very important too, maybe it doesn't matter nowadays, it even went as far as Stu didn't fit in with the bands image, so he wasn't offically in the group, he was always there in the background playing fantastic boogie piano, & as a roadie, but to be pictured in with the group's shots, there's just the offical members.
Here is another Bio I found on the net. http://www.wwwk.co.uk/people/musicians/profiles/r/rolling-stones.htm
The Rolling Stones Biography |
| 23rd November 2007 09:20 AM |
|
|
| Lord (Hetero) |
IMO BobbyK is much more a Stone than Darryl or Chucky |
| 23rd November 2007 02:00 PM |
|
|
| Gazza |
There are only eight Rolling Stones.
The current four plus Bill, Brian, Mick T and Stu.
To consider a sideman as a 'Stone' just because he's been a hired hand for a certain number of years is nonsensical.
You could make a stronger argument for guys like Dick Taylor who WERE actually in the band before they got a record deal. |
