ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

© 2002 RY/Rex Fearures
[THE WET PAGE] [IORR NEWS] [SETLISTS 1962-2003] [THE A/V ROOM] [THE ART GALLERY] [MICK JAGGER] [KEITHFUCIUS] [CHARLIE WATTS ] [RON WOOD] [BRIAN JONES] [MICK TAYLOR] [BILL WYMAN] [IAN STEWART ] [NICKY HOPKINS] [MERRY CLAYTON] [IAN 'MAC' McLAGAN] [BERNARD FOWLER] [LISA FISCHER] [DARRYL JONES] [BOBBY KEYS] [JAMES PHELGE] [CHUCK LEAVELL] [LINKS] [PHOTOS] [MAGAZINE COVERS] [MUSIC COVERS ] [JIMI HENDRIX] [BOOTLEGS] [TEMPLE] [GUESTBOOK] [ADMIN]

[CHAT ROOM aka THE FUN HOUSE] [RESTROOMS]

NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
Enter artist an start searching using "Power Search" (RECOMMENDED) inside.
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:

PicoSearch
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
Register | Update Profile | F.A.Q. | Admin Control Panel

Topic: Anyone? Return to archive
October 22nd, 2004 11:57 AM
star star has anyone any idea what "Monkey Man" is about? Great lyric, but confusing! Fantastic lead, rhythm and slide hooks from Keef and monster drumming from Charlie though!!
October 22nd, 2004 12:20 PM
glencar It's an homage to Jacques Derrida.
October 22nd, 2004 12:59 PM
56DeSoto It's a sensitive discourse on anthropology.
October 22nd, 2004 01:01 PM
kmc that's some leap to connect MONKEY MAN to JD. unless it's just the wordplay. will have fun trying.

if anyone cares about jacques derrida - from ny times obit:

Jacques Derrida, Abstruse Theorist, Dies at 74
>
> October 10, 2004
> By JONATHAN KANDELL
>
>
>
>
>
> Jacques Derrida, the Algerian-born, French intellectual who
> became one of the most celebrated and notoriously difficult
> philosophers of the late 20th century, died Friday at a
> Paris hospital, the French president's office announced. He
> was 74.
>
> The cause of death was pancreatic cancer, according to
> French television, The Associated Press reported.
>
> Mr. Derrida was known as the father of deconstruction, the
> method of inquiry that asserted that all writing was full
> of confusion and contradiction, and that the author's
> intent could not overcome the inherent contradictions of
> language itself, robbing texts - whether literature,
> history or philosophy - of truthfulness, absolute meaning
> and permanence. The concept was eventually applied to the
> whole gamut of arts and social sciences, including
> linguistics, anthropology, political science, even
> architecture.
>
> While he had a huge following - larger in the United States
> than in Europe - he was the target of as much anger as
> admiration. For many Americans, in particular, he was the
> personification of a French school of thinking they felt
> was undermining many of the traditional standards of
> classical education, and one they often associated with
> divisive political causes.
>
> Literary critics broke texts into isolated passages and
> phrases to find hidden meanings. Advocates of feminism, gay
> rights, and third-world causes embraced the method as an
> instrument to reveal the prejudices and inconsistencies of
> Plato, Aristotle, Shakespeare, Freud and other "dead white
> male" icons of Western culture. Architects and designers
> could claim to take a "deconstructionist" approach to
> buildings by abandoning traditional symmetry and creating
> zigzaggy, sometimes disquieting spaces. The filmmaker Woody
> Allen titled one of his movies "Deconstructing Harry," to
> suggest that his protagonist could best be understood by
> breaking down and analyzing his neurotic contradictions.
>
> A Code Word for Discourse
>
> Toward the end of the 20th
> century, deconstruction became a code word of intellectual
> discourse, much as existentialism and structuralism - two
> other fashionable, slippery philosophies that also emerged
> from France after World War II - had been before it. Mr.
> Derrida and his followers were unwilling - some say unable
> - to define deconstruction with any precision, so it has
> remained misunderstood, or interpreted in endlessly
> contradictory ways.
>
> Typical of Mr. Derrida's murky explanations of his
> philosophy was a 1993 paper he presented at the Benjamin N.
> Cardozo School of Law, in New York, which began: "Needless
> to say, one more time, deconstruction, if there is such a
> thing, takes place as the experience of the impossible."
>
> Mr. Derrida was a prolific writer, but his 40-plus books on
> various aspects of deconstruction were no more easily
> accessible. Even some of their titles - "Of Grammatology,"
> "The Postcard: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond," and
> "Ulysses Gramophone: Hear Say Yes in Joyce" - could be
> off-putting to the uninitiated.
>
> "Many otherwise unmalicious people have in fact been guilty
> of wishing for deconstruction's demise - if only to relieve
> themselves of the burden of trying to understand it,"
> Mitchell Stephens, a journalism professor at New York
> University, wrote in a 1994 article in The New York Times
> Magazine.
>
> Mr. Derrida's credibility was also damaged by a 1987
> scandal involving Paul de Man, a Yale University professor
> who was the most acclaimed exponent of deconstruction in
> the United States. Four years after Mr. de Man's death, it
> was revealed that he had contributed numerous pro-Nazi,
> anti-Semitic articles to a newspaper in Belgium, where he
> was born, while it was under German occupation during World
> War II. In defending his dead colleague, Mr. Derrida, a
> Jew, was understood by some people to be condoning Mr. de
> Man's anti-Semitism.
>
> A Devoted Following
>
> Nonetheless, during the 1970's and 1980's, Mr. Derrida's
> writings and lectures gained him a huge following in major
> American universities - in the end, he proved far more
> influential in the United States than in France. For young,
> ambitious professors, his teachings became a springboard to
> tenure in faculties dominated by senior colleagues and
> older, shopworn philosophies. For many students,
> deconstruction was a rite of passage into the world of
> rebellious intellect.
>
> Jacques Derrida was born on July 15, 1930, in El-Biar,
> Algeria. His father was a salesman. At age 12, he was
> expelled from his French school when the rector, adhering
> to the Vichy government's racial laws, ordered a drastic
> cut in Jewish enrollment. Even as a teenager, Mr. Derrida
> (the name is pronounced day-ree-DAH) was a voracious reader
> whose eclectic interests embraced the philosophers
> Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Friedrich Nietzsche, Albert
> Camus, and the poet Paul Valéry.
>
> But he could be an indifferent student. He failed his
> baccalaureate in his first attempt. He twice failed his
> entrance exam to the École Normal Supérieure, the
> traditional cradle of French intellectuals, where he was
> finally admitted in 1952. There he failed the oral portion
> of his final exams on his first attempt. After graduation
> in 1956, he studied briefly at Harvard University. For most
> of the next 30 years, he taught philosophy and logic at
> both the University of Paris and the École Normal
> Supérieure. Yet he did not defend his doctoral dissertation
> until 1980, when he was 50 years old.
>
> By the early 1960's, Mr. Derrida had made a name for
> himself as a rising young intellectual in Paris by
> publishing articles on language and philosophy in leading
> academic journals. He was especially influenced by the
> German philosophers, Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger.
> Both were strong critics of traditional metaphysics, a
> branch of philosophy which explored the basis and
> perception of reality.
>
> As a lecturer, Mr. Derrida cultivated charisma and mystery.
> For many years, he declined to be photographed for
> publication. He cut a dashing, handsome figure at the
> lectern, with his thick thatch of prematurely white hair,
> tanned complexion, and well-tailored suits. He peppered his
> lectures with puns, rhymes and enigmatic pronouncements,
> like, "Thinking is what we already know that we have not
> yet begun," or, "Oh my friends, there is no friend..."
>
> Many readers found his prose turgid and baffling, even as
> aficionados found it illuminating. A single sentence could
> run for three pages, and a footnote even longer. Sometimes
> his books were written in "deconstructed" style. For
> example, "Glas" (1974) offers commentaries on the German
> philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and the French
> novelist Jean Genet in parallel columns of the book's
> pages; in between, there is an occasional third column of
> commentary about the two men's ideas.
>
> "The trouble with reading Mr. Derrida is that there is too
> much perspiration for too little inspiration,"
> editorialized The Economist in 1992, when Cambridge
> University awarded the philosopher an honorary degree after
> a bruising argument among his supporters and critics on the
> faculty. Elsewhere in Europe, Mr. Derrida's deconstruction
> philosophy gained earlier and easier acceptance.
>
> Shaking Up a Discipline
>
> Mr. Derrida appeared on the
> American intellectual landscape at a 1966 conference on the
> French intellectual movement known as structuralism at
> Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore. Its high priest was
> French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss, who studied
> societies through their linguistic structure.
>
> Mr. Derrida shocked his American audience by announcing
> that structuralism was already passé in France, and that
> Mr. Lévi-Strauss's ideas were too rigid. Instead, Mr.
> Derrida offered deconstruction as the new, triumphant
> philosophy.
>
> His presentation fired up young professors who were in
> search of a new intellectual movement to call their own. In
> a Los Angeles Times Magazine article in 1991, Mr. Stephens,
> the journalism professor, wrote: "He gave literature
> professors a special gift: a chance to confront - not as
> mere second-rate philosophers, not as mere interpreters of
> novelists, but as full-fledged explorers in their own right
> - the most profound paradoxes of Western thought."
>
> "If they really read, if they stared intently enough at the
> metaphors," he went on, "literature professors, from the
> comfort of their own easy chairs, could reveal the
> hollowness of the basic assumptions that lie behind all our
> writings."
>
> Other critics found it disturbing that obscure academics
> could presume to denigrate a Sophocles, Voltaire or Tolstoy
> by seeking out cultural biases and inexact language in
> their masterpieces. "Literature, the deconstructionists
> frequently proved, had been written by entirely the wrong
> people for entirely the wrong reasons," wrote Malcolm
> Bradbury, a British novelist and professor, in a 1991
> article for The New York Times Book Review.
>
> Mr. Derrida's influence was especially strong in the Yale
> University literature department, where one of his close
> friends, a Belgian-born professor, Paul de Man, emerged as
> a leading champion of deconstruction in literary analysis.
> Mr. de Man had claimed to be a refugee from war-torn
> Europe, and even left the impression among colleagues that
> he had joined the Belgian resistance.
>
> But in 1987, four years after Mr. de Man's death, research
> revealed that he had written over 170 articles in the early
> 1940's for Le Soir, a Nazi newspaper in Belgium. Some of
> these articles were openly anti-Semitic, including one that
> echoed Nazi calls for "a final solution" and seemed to
> defend the notion of concentration camps.
>
> "A solution to the Jewish problem that aimed at the
> creation of a Jewish colony isolated from Europe would
> entail no deplorable consequences for the literary life of
> the West," wrote Mr. de Man.
>
> The revelations became a major scandal at Yale and other
> campuses where the late Mr. de Man had been lionized as an
> intellectual hero. Some former colleagues asserted that the
> scandal was being used to discredit deconstruction by
> people who were always hostile to the movement. But Mr.
> Derrida gave fodder to critics by defending Mr. de Man, and
> even using literary deconstruction techniques in an attempt
> to demonstrate that the Belgian scholar's newspaper
> articles were not really anti-Semitic.
>
> "Borrowing Derrida's logic one could deconstruct Mein Kampf
> to reveal that [Adolf Hitler] was in conflict with
> anti-Semitism," scoffed Peter Lennon, in a 1992 article for
> The Guardian. According to another critic, Mark Lilla, in a
> 1998 article in The New York Review of Books, Mr. Derrida's
> contortionist defense of his old friend left "the
> impression that deconstruction means you never have to say
> you're sorry."
>
> Almost as devastating for deconstruction and Mr. Derrida
> was the revelation, also in 1987, that Heidegger, one of
> his intellectual muses, was a dues-paying member of the
> Nazi Party from 1933 to 1945. Once again, Mr. Derrida was
> accused by critics of being irresolute, this time for
> failing to condemn Heidegger's fascist ideas.
>
> By the late 1980's, Mr. Derrida's intellectual star was on
> the wane on both sides of the Atlantic. But he continued to
> commute between France and the United States, where he was
> paid hefty fees to lecture a few weeks every year at
> several East Coast universities and the University of
> California at Irvine.
>
> Lifting a Mysterious Aura
>
> In his early years of intellectual fame, Mr. Derrida was
> criticized by European leftists for a lack of political
> commitment - indeed, for espousing a philosophy that
> attacked the very concept of absolute political
> certainties. But in the 1980's, he became active in a
> number of political causes, opposing apartheid, defending
> Czech dissidents and supporting the rights of North African
> immigrants in France.
>
> Mr. Derrida also became far more accessible to the media.
> He sat still for photos and gave interviews that stripped
> away his formerly mysterious aura to reveal the mundane
> details of his personal life.
>
> A former Yale student, Amy Ziering Kofman, focused on him
> in a 2002 documentary, "Derrida," that some reviewers found
> charming. "With his unruly white hair and hawklike face,
> Derrida is a compelling presence even when he is merely
> pondering a question," wrote Kenneth Turan in The Los
> Angeles Times. "Even his off-the-cuff comments are
> intriguing, because everything gets serious consideration.
> And when he is wary, he's never difficult for its own sake
> but because his philosophical positions make him that way."
>
>
> Rather than hang around the Left Bank cafés traditionally
> inhabited by French intellectuals, Mr. Derrida preferred
> the quiet of Ris-Orangis, a suburb south of Paris, where he
> lived in a small house with his wife, Marguerite
> Aucouturier, a psychoanalyst. The couple had two sons,
> Pierre and Jean. He also had a son, Daniel, with Sylviane
> Agacinski, a philosophy teacher who later married the
> French political leader Lionel Jospin.
>
> As a young man, Mr. Derrida confessed, he hoped to become a
> professional soccer player. And he admitted to being an
> inveterate viewer of television, watching everything from
> news to soap operas. "I am critical of what I'm watching,"
> said Mr. Derrida with mock pride. "I deconstruct all the
> time."
>
> Late in his career, Mr. Derrida was asked, as he had been
> so often, what deconstruction was. "Why don't you ask a
> physicist or a mathematician about difficulty?" he replied,
> frostily, to Dinitia Smith, a Times reporter, in a 1998.
> "Deconstruction requires work. If deconstruction is so
> obscure, why are the audiences in my lectures in the
> thousands? They feel they understand enough to understand
> more."
>
> Asked later in the same interview to at least define
> deconstruction, Mr. Derrida said: "It is impossible to
> respond. I can only do something which will leave me
> unsatisfied."
October 22nd, 2004 01:14 PM
glencar It was a joke.
October 22nd, 2004 01:18 PM
Nellcote Hey KMC, that's some mean copy & paste you got going on there. I've got to master that at some point, especially those quality indenture marks on the left side of my page.
Move your head up & down while looking at those, takes me back to the early 70's, listening to "Hey Joe", dude. Thanks!
October 22nd, 2004 01:55 PM
kmc give me the duh award. somebody had actually sent me that obit just recently and i couldn't remember why. (still don't.) so being a stones fan i made that fantastic leap when i read the name jacques derrida. crash and burn big time.

as for my cutting and pasting, that's a whole other story.

geez, this board is vicious!
October 22nd, 2004 02:08 PM
Bloozehound I am a big fan of the indenture marks, they give the article a sudden sense of urgancy that yells, "Here I am! I must be read!"
October 22nd, 2004 02:22 PM
Nellcote Vicious? No, a leopard at five feet is vicious.
The attempt at reliving a flashback moment from my youth?
BRING IT ON!
Oh, what a beautiful buzz....
October 22nd, 2004 02:28 PM
kmc now i was joking!

any stones news is good news from someone who grew up hanging on the few stones crumbs published in RAVE, 16 and TIGERBEAT.
October 22nd, 2004 03:37 PM
Soldatti
quote:
star star wrote:
has anyone any idea what "Monkey Man" is about?



It's very sarcastic, it's the only that I can say.