quote:

---

glencar wrote:
Joshy, you're a libertarian. And no matter what, Bubba "blew" it yesterday.

---

quote:

---

telecaster wrote:


jb. Hint. Clinton ain't running again

Disgrace to his dad? You mean Mike Wallace who bascially sucked the dick of the President of Iran in that sham of an interview last month?

Mike Wallace is typical of today's weak American Jew. I wish you all had 1/10th the nuts of your Israeli cousins

---

quote:

---

rasputin56 wrote:


He is a hero to the masses and is beloved by more than Bush will ever dream of.

---

quote:

---

telecaster wrote:

jb did you know that before he was Pres Clinton never made over $35k a year and never owned a house

Fact

---

quote:

---

Riffhard wrote:


No not true. I am the first to admit that serious questions need asking and answering. However,what many in the media do is to completely undermine every single move that Bush makes. Here's a perfect example. When the Abu Garibe story broke two years ago. That April the NYT ran 47 above-the-fold articles about it. Forty seven stories!! 47!!! Why? It only inflamed the Islamofucks more. They ran ONE story about the beheading of four Americans above-the-fold. One!! One fucking story!! That's it.

Newsweek goes to press about a Koran getting flushed down the toilet in Gitmo and the whole fucking Islamofuck Street goes up in arms and kills over fifty people. One problem. The story was wholly untrue. It did not happen!

The NYT leaks every tip they get regardless of the national security threat. They do that for one reason,and one reason alone. To undermine Bush. It's pathetic and I'll go so far as to say it's unAmerican. In WWII the media constantly bent over backwards to keep national secrets secret. It was about collectivly trying to defeat our common enemy. Today the NYT is all about defeating Bush. It's obvious as fuck,and to deny it only shows either a very partisan bias,or no genuine knowledge of the subject.


Riffy

---

quote:

---

glencar wrote:
No, he's just a dumb hick cocksucker. That's all.

---

quote:

---

glencar wrote:
The NY Times ran 23 front page stories when the 2001 Masters was being held. They were trying to get women into the club.

---

quote:

---

Brainbell Jangler wrote:

And this is a criticism? A man rises from the humblest of beginnings to become leader of the Free World and you have a PROBLEM with that??? It reminds me of my own path from poverty to Harvard Law School. The question is, tele, Why do you hate the American Dream?

Please explain to me how being born into a rich, powerful, well-connected family, failing at everything you try until you're 40 and then taking over the presidency with the help of your Daddy's buddies on the Supreme Court is a more American story than Bubba's. As Ann Richards said, "George W. Bush was born on third base and thought he hit a triple."

---

quote:

---

rasputin56 wrote:


He is a hero to the masses and is beloved by more than Bush will ever dream of.

---

quote:

---

telecaster wrote:


Results don't matter, just like me

---

quote:

---

Riffhard wrote:



Yep! I forgot about that story! Or should I say stories! LOL! The NYT is nothing more than a liberal mouthpiece. Try and get libs to admit it though. They can't see the liberal forest for the liberal trees.



Riffy

---

quote:

---

jb wrote:
I beleive Joey is the greatest success story this board has ever seen...

---

quote:

---

Brainbell Jangler wrote:

And this is a criticism? A man rises from the humblest of beginnings to become leader of the Free World and you have a PROBLEM with that??? It reminds me of my own path from poverty to Harvard Law School. The question is, tele, Why do you hate the American Dream?

Please explain to me how being born into a rich, powerful, well-connected family, failing at everything you try until you're 40 and then taking over the presidency with the help of your Daddy's buddies on the Supreme Court is a more American story than Bubba's. As Ann Richards said, "George W. Bush was born on third base and thought he hit a triple."
plished.jpg[/img]

---

quote:

---

glencar wrote:
He's a fag. We have all grown to hate him.

---

quote:

---

glencar wrote:
You're consistently wrong today, Rongo! Annie Richards said that about his Dad at the 1992 DNC Convention. She was half in the bag at the time.

---

quote:

---

Poplar wrote:

Guy was president for 8 years while Al Qaeda planned 9/11. By any measure, he should have to answer questions about his administration's policies regarding Bin Laden. He actually gets asked about that, and he flies off on some "right wing conspiracy" rant and attacks the reporter. not sure how that earns him any points with anybody.

Bush should have to answer questions (and a shit load of them) as well. But Christ, so should Clinton, and he should have a better answer than he provided in this interview.

ps - 9/11 report found that Clinton blew five (5) chances to get bin Laden. so no way bubba can play the "don't ask me" card.

---

quote:

---

Brainbell Jangler wrote:

I'm wrong but you're wronger. The quote IS about Dubya, but it was said by Jim Hightower, not Ann Richards. The 1992 quote from Richards about George Sr. was, "Poor George. He can't help it. He was born with a silver foot in his mouth."

---

quote:

---

telecaster wrote:


Feej ever notice howe the Dems and the Arab street are always pissed or offended or outraged over something someone said but yet offer zero alternatives or solutions

Very telling......

---

quote:

---

rasputin56 wrote:


Funny, when Scooter's whore Miller was doing the bidding for Bush to get his little vendetta war, the righties didn't seem to mind too much.

And you're right. When we torture people, it should be kept secret.

---

quote:

---

Brainbell Jangler wrote:

And this is a criticism? A man rises from the humblest of beginnings to become leader of the Free World and you have a PROBLEM with that??? It reminds me of my own path from poverty to Harvard Law School. The question is, tele, Why do you hate the American Dream?

---

quote:

---

telecaster wrote:


Please. The new liberal version defines torture as having a woman interview a Muslim man and also listening to the Red Hot Chili Peppers

---

quote:

---

GimmeExile wrote:
From an objective point of view, I don't understand how anyone could hear that the "country is under attack" and not have the general curiosity to get up and see the news.

---