He looks like a hole in the middle of that flick. Rest of the cast looks great.
[Edited by glencar]
14th September 2006 12:55 PM
GotToRollMe
I thought this was gonna be another Borat thread!
16th September 2006 07:30 PM
IanBillen
Seems like they went away from the lines of the smooth, great looking, suave type this time.
He seems more of a bad guy in looks and the way they cast him.
However he does not seem so captivating or unique. Good concept to change it up. Not the a numero-uno choice for a character.
He is OK. Just nothing truly unique, and a Bond character needs that special something. I don't see it too much in this dude.
Ian
[Edited by IanBillen]
16th September 2006 07:44 PM
Bloozehound
they need to give the Bond films a break, they suck
16th September 2006 10:42 PM
Poplar
judging by that trailer- i'm thinking this one will be better than the past few.
16th September 2006 10:43 PM
Le chef
quote:GotToRollMe wrote:
I thought this was gonna be another Borat thread!
17th September 2006 07:33 AM
corgi37
The character has gone back to what he was in the books. Except for the frigging blonde hair. But, looks like he's played too 1 dimensional now. I love Bond films. Well, i did. Connery is the man, no doubt. I didnt even see the last one.
Just aint the same without old "Q".
17th September 2006 11:37 AM
Riffhard
Looks great to me. I am happy to see that they are going back to the vengeful meanspirted Bond. That is much more in keeping with the original character as written by Flemming. Moore was the absolute worst Bond in that he was portrayed as this campy wisecracking jokster that just happened to be a 00 agent. Now Connery,on the other hand,nailed the roll.
Remember the scene in Dr. No where Professor Dent trys to personally kill Bond? He walks into Bond's bungalow and pumps a bunch of rounds into the bed where he mistakenly thinks Bonds is asleep. Then Bond alerts him of his prescence. Dent turns and attempts to fire again. However,he was out of bullets and Bond kills him on the spot. Great scene,and totally in keeping with the book. That was all lost with the 1970's campy Roger Moore version of Bond.
This guy Daniel Craig looks like he has that old Connery swagger back. I will checking the movie out as soon as it hits theaters in November.
Riffy
18th September 2006 11:16 AM
glencar
I never watched the Pierce Brosnan ones.
19th September 2006 06:49 PM
Honky Tonk Man
I don't know too much about Daniel Craig, other than that he's been gettig flack over here because of the Bond thing. I've only ever seen him in one film. Its called Layercake and he was particulary brilliant in it.
I've seen a trailer for the new Bond flick and it looked impresive. I just can't help but feel that because of the fact that Casino Royal was the original Ian Flemming book, many are pressuming that it's going to be Bond back to his original best. I guess we'll all have to wait and see
19th September 2006 06:51 PM
Saint Sway
Charlie Watts should be the new Bond.
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:
The Rolling Stones World Tour 2005 Rolling Stones Bigger Bang Tour 2005 2006 Rolling Stones Forum - Rolling Stones Message Board - Mick Jagger - Keith Richards - Brian Jones - Charlie Watts - Ian Stewart - Stu - Bill Wyman - Mick Taylor - Ronnie Wood - Ron Wood - Rolling Stones 2005 Tour - Farewell Tour - Rolling Stones: Onstage World Tour A Bigger Bang US Tour
NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
