| 7th September 2007 08:18 AM |
|
|
| Mr Jurkka |
Ron looks healty and nice but who is that mummy next to him? |
| 7th September 2007 09:27 AM |
|
|
| HAWKEYE AND BJ |
anita is not a sex pot anymore now is she, i bet keith would pass on the back seat of the bentley now huh |
| 7th September 2007 09:41 AM |
|
|
| Ten Thousand Motels |
quote:
HAWKEYE AND BJ wrote:
anita is not a sex pot anymore now is she, i bet keith would pass on the back seat of the bentley now huh
Some people age gracefully, some people don't. |
| 7th September 2007 10:59 AM |
|
|
| luxury1 |
unfortunately, photographic evidence that anything in excess will tear you down... |
| 7th September 2007 11:47 AM |
|
|
| aladdinstory |
quote:
BILL PERKS wrote:
CHRIST, SHE'S 65!! LEAVE HER ALONE
true, but the problem is she looks a rugged 75.
"Well now look at your face now baby, look at yours and look at me"
|
| 7th September 2007 11:48 AM |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
corgi37 wrote:
Fucking hell, she is hideous! If i let my kids see her they wont sleep for a week.
On the other hand, if you do let your kids see that, maybe they'll say no to drugs. |
| 7th September 2007 11:48 AM |
|
|
| aladdinstory |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
She's probably whom they were thinking about whenever they wrote those lyrics.
Possibley, but if Mick wrote them, then more likely Bianca was the object of that lyrical derision. |
| 7th September 2007 03:38 PM |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
aladdinstory wrote:
Possibley, but if Mick wrote them, then more likely Bianca was the object of that lyrical derision.
Mick could have written them about Anita. |
| 7th September 2007 06:57 PM |
|
|
| fireontheplatter |
quote:
BILL PERKS wrote:
CHRIST, SHE'S 65!! LEAVE HER ALONE
exacty.... |
| 7th September 2007 08:57 PM |
|
|
| gypsy |
Actually, in recent interviews, she claims to have been born in 1947. That is an absolute falsehood. She was born in 1942 or 1944, depending on which sources you believe. |
| 7th September 2007 09:03 PM |
|
|
| Glimmer Twin |
quote:
Bitch wrote:
Are you sure that's even her? Ugh! Sad looking pics of Anita!
This reminds me of the song lyrics.....When you're old, when you're old, nobody will know, that you were a beauty, a sweet sweet beauty
Hahaha, actually reminds me of Black Limosine:
I get so scared
Just to see you on the street
They're living dead
Your all the same, you never speak
Your wrecked out now
Washed up high up on the beach
Well now look at your face now baby
Look at you and look at me
|
| 8th September 2007 12:03 AM |
|
|
| BILL PERKS |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
Actually, in recent interviews, she claims to have been born in 1947. That is an absolute falsehood. She was born in 1942 or 1944, depending on which sources you believe.
MY SOURCES SAY 1942..AND THEY KNOW THEIR SHIT |
| 8th September 2007 03:08 AM |
|
|
| Brainbell Jangler |
quote:
Boogie-Woogie wrote:
fuck, she looks old!
ronnie really looks 15 years younger than her and he did drugs as well...
man, keith looks really young compared to her;-)
It is said that life is unfair: men, as we grow older, look more and more like Sean Connery; while women, as they grow older, look more and more like . . . Sean Connery. |
| 8th September 2007 08:24 AM |
|
|
| speedfreakjive |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
On the other hand, if you do let your kids see that, maybe they'll say no to drugs.
very funny - or they wont be annoying |
| 9th September 2007 08:03 PM |
|
|
| stonedinaustralia |
quote:
luxury1 wrote:
unfortunately, photographic evidence that anything in excess will tear you down...
especially TIME |
| 9th September 2007 10:44 PM |
|
|
| oldkr |
time has played a very small role in anita's fall to hagdom
OLDKR |
| 9th September 2007 11:32 PM |
|
|
| stonedinaustralia |
bullshit
time more than anything -then genetics - substance (ab)use comes in a poor third - the effects of that are generally dictated by the physiological make up of the (ab)user
or are you suggesting her connection with things occult and magick etc. has had an effect as well ( a kind of dorian gray type sitch or similiar)
[Edited by stonedinaustralia] |
| 10th September 2007 12:53 AM |
|
|
| MikeyC613 |
But I wonder..
how is time...
gonna change her? |
| 10th September 2007 01:01 AM |
|
|
| oldkr |
marianne looks 20 years younger than she does, patti smith looks 30 years younger.
Anita spent too much time in the sun shooting up and passing out. Accept that she is a hag.
OLDKR |
| 10th September 2007 12:30 PM |
|
|
| dirtyden |
bet you she's still got a great ass |
| 10th September 2007 11:58 PM |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
oldkr wrote:
marianne looks 20 years younger than she does, patti smith looks 30 years younger.
Anita spent too much time in the sun shooting up and passing out. Accept that she is a hag.
OLDKR
I agree. All of the above AND too much booze. |
| 11th September 2007 12:25 AM |
|
|
| pdog |
quote:
dirtyden wrote:
bet you she's still got a great ass
GMILF? |
| 11th September 2007 12:43 AM |
|
|
| oldkr |
GGGMILF more like
OLDKR |
| 11th September 2007 12:49 AM |
|
|
| Mel Belli |
quote:
pdog wrote:
GMILF?
 |
| 11th September 2007 03:43 PM |
|
|
| glencar |
I can't forget her in North Vietnam supporting the enemy. |
| 11th September 2007 07:17 PM |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
glencar wrote:
I can't forget her in North Vietnam supporting the enemy.
Me neither. She'll always be "Hanoi Jane" to me. Can't stand the bitch. |
| 11th September 2007 09:40 PM |
|
|
| Bloozehound |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
Actually, in recent interviews, she claims to have been born in 1947. That is an absolute falsehood. She was born in 1942 or 1944, depending on which sources you believe.
Are they sure she wasn't born in 1801 |
