| 11th September 2006 01:42 PM |
|
|
| not bound to please |
quote:
WJ wrote:
Actually, the only parts I liked were the full frontal male nudity.
Gay porn is better.
It was only the guy who played Brian, right? He was kinda homely.
The only one who looked like the character they were playing was the guy who played Mick.
It's fun to watch train wrecks.
|
| 11th September 2006 01:45 PM |
|
|
| WJ |
quote:
not bound to please wrote:
Gay porn is better.
It was only the guy who played Brian, right? He was kinda homely.
The only one who looked like the character they were playing was the guy who played Mick.
It's fun to watch train wrecks.
The guy who played brian wasn't good looking, in my opinion.
You're forgetting the part where "brian" and "keith" both stand naked talking to each other while a naked anita lounges on a bed in the background. Only interesting part of the movie. |
| 11th September 2006 01:56 PM |
|
|
| GhostofBrianJones |
No Brian was not saint and being a human he was not perfect. For those
who happen to be interested, reading as many books on the Stones especially
from the SIXTIES is very interesting. Also looking in to the Sixties era can also
give the reasons stated for the way he was treated. Brian had a tremendous
time coping with his own issues and being a rock star trying to deal with
sudden fame and fortune. No one told him how to, supported him very much,
and took the time to see what was really going on because it was an era of
ignorance, archiac attitudes and a very oppressed society for the most part.
Brian did not have the so called "bootstraps" to pull himself out of his depression, feelings of being unloved (like maybe from his parents) and probably no one to really talk to. His emotional situation, and his issues
were constantly in the way of Brian really growing and developing emotionally
and mentally. I guess no one took the time to tell him HOW to write a song,
or that not everyone CAN write a song. I also suspect no one took the time to
really TALK to him to find out what was causing his behavior and offering any
type of friendship or support. They just cast him aside and treated him with
cruel indifference and hostility. But the man was a genius guitar player,
and played many other instruments
Also I read where Keith and Anita started using heroin while Brian was still
alive and the other band members noticed changes in their behavior? But
at the time I guess no one knew that was a RED FLAG that their addictions
were stifling them too.
I truly believe if he had been fortunate to have found a good counselor
and had some honest help in stopping his drinking/drugging he very well
would still be alive today. |
| 11th September 2006 04:21 PM |
|
|
| texile |
quote:
corgi37 wrote:
I dont care if he started the band. I dont care how versatile he was or how blonde he was. The best thing the Stones ever dead was get rid of him. He was such a millstone by the end. They couldnt even record, let alone tour, with him.
agree -
i respect his place in the stones but the music became richer AFTER his death...
it's always been mick and keith. |
| 11th September 2006 10:38 PM |
|
|
| Sophia Graves |
quote:
WJ wrote:
Actually, the only parts I liked were the full frontal male nudity.
HAHAHAHA!!!! |
