| 6th September 2006 03:29 PM |
|
|
| jb |
quote:
voodoopug wrote:
my wife was extremely complimented. Ask Mrs. jb how embarrassed she would be if someone thought she was your daughter.
This is not sound reasoning. Why people would think your wife is your daughter, spending time in Wildwood, is very disturbing. |
| 6th September 2006 03:30 PM |
|
|
| voodoopug |
quote:
jb wrote:
This is not sound reasoning. Why people would think your wife is your daughter, spending time in Wildwood, is very disturbing.
[Edited by voodoopug] |
| 6th September 2006 03:32 PM |
|
|
| aladdinstory |
quote:
voodoopug wrote:
I beleive Chuck is a very good piano/organ player....much better than Matt Clifford. Sadly, most die hard fans will hate him for two reasons: 1. He is not Ian Stewart, and 2. He is actually "in charge" on stage.
I would actually rather hear Back to Zero live than IORR, YGMR, TD, and a few others! Chuck is the only reason that we have not seen the exact same setlist for the last 10 years or so.......we should all remember that!
chuck is fine keyboard player no doubt, has done great work over the years with incredible artists but definitely not funky, which is what would be needed for the clavinet run on 100YA. you certainly seem to admire the man...is he a relative or something? |
| 6th September 2006 03:33 PM |
|
|
| jb |
quote:
voodoopug wrote:
[Edited by voodoopug]
Oh Geez!!!!!!! |
| 6th September 2006 03:37 PM |
|
|
| Poplar |
I've always said: one of their most underappreciated songs. |
| 6th September 2006 03:38 PM |
|
|
| aladdinstory |
quote:
voodoopug wrote:
[Edited by voodoopug]
"Watch The Tram Care Please"
hey, nice pic i've stayed at that motel before lots of times! i've heard wildwood is getting overrun with condos and alot of the old classic motels are coming down. too bad, i've always enjoyed the "time warp" aspect to WW and the boards. hope you got a pie at Sam's and some of Curly's Fries. |
| 6th September 2006 03:49 PM |
|
|
| voodoopug |
quote:
aladdinstory wrote:
chuck is fine keyboard player no doubt, has done great work over the years with incredible artists but definitely not funky, which is what would be needed for the clavinet run on 100YA. you certainly seem to admire the man...is he a relative or something?
\
No, I just appreciate when the setlist changes and I know who is the one responsible for that. |
| 6th September 2006 03:53 PM |
|
|
| Saint Sway |
quote:
voodoopug wrote:
No, I just appreciate when the setlist changes and I know who is the one responsible for that.
Thank you Pug.
Certainly over the course of the tour I have done my part to let the band know that the set lists must vary. But, still, I humbly can not take full responsibility for said changes. But I appreciate your acknowledgement of my importance here. |
| 6th September 2006 05:29 PM |
|
|
| texile |
quote:
Bruno wrote:
GHS was the first "real" record I bought (the first was Hot Rocks) back when I was 13 and I couldnīt be more hooked. I love the whole album and think it is their most underrated one. It has a much better sound than IORR, imo.
100 Years Ago makes me wonder what we could have if the two Micks had written and recorded more songs together. Sway has no Keith and so has 100 Years.
There is nothing in this song that could be left out of the record. Vocals, the excelent work by Nicky and Billy, the amazing guitar. But I think the one who shines the most there is Mr. Watts. His playing is perfect and he is a animal in the end. Put Mick screaming "IIIIIIII Waaaaaaarn you, I waaaaaaaarn you baby", Taylor playing like the God he was and Charlie doing what he does together and you have the proof that the Rolling Stones were/are the greatest rock n roll band.
[Edited by Bruno]
agree -
i love keith but the two micks had a different magic together and this song is a great example.
throughout the album, you can hear the vocal and guitar interplay between the two -
keith was in his own world when his played, but mt sounded like he was answering jagger's lines.... |
| 6th September 2006 09:21 PM |
|
|
| Mel Belli |
quote:
voodoopug wrote:
Chuck is the only reason that we have not seen the exact same setlist for the last 10 years or so.......we should all remember that!
In D.C., we call that a "true fact." |
| 6th September 2006 09:34 PM |
|
|
| sirmoonie |
Great song despite the Mick Taylor BS at the end. 100 Years Ado had an Exile vibe to it. |
| 6th September 2006 09:43 PM |
|
|
| lotsajizz |
lyrics suck, trite bridge...poor |
| 6th September 2006 10:12 PM |
|
|
| Soldatti |
Awesome song. |
| 7th September 2006 03:06 AM |
|
|
| aladdinstory |
quote:
sirmoonie wrote:
Great song despite the Mick Taylor BS at the end. 100 Years Ado had an Exile vibe to it.
hmm, i don't see it as particularly exiley however since it does date back to '70 i believe, it certainly was written around the same time as many exile songs so that vibe is a definite possibility because of that. there just wasn't anything remotely funky on Exile, maybe Casino Boogie, but even that is a stretch |
| 7th September 2006 03:07 AM |
|
|
| aladdinstory |
quote:
lotsajizz wrote:
lyrics suck,
are we listening to the same song???? how are those lyrics trite??? i'd like to know... |
| 7th September 2006 05:15 AM |
|
|
| Fabio Hot Stuff |
you have the proof that the Rolling Stones were/are the greatest rock n roll band.
yeah, Bruno, you hit the jackpot!
your post is right on 100% |
| 7th September 2006 11:11 AM |
|
|
| Bruno |
quote:
texile wrote:
agree -
i love keith but the two micks had a different magic together and this song is a great example.
throughout the album, you can hear the vocal and guitar interplay between the two -
keith was in his own world when his played, but mt sounded like he was answering jagger's lines....
Yeah man, the magic interplay between them in Winter, Jagger singing and Taylor answering with those beautiful licks, incredible...
"And it's sure been a cold, cold winter... pen peun poun oun peun pounn..." eeer... you know what I mean with these pens pouns 
And letīs not forget Moonlight Mile, of course. |
| 7th September 2006 11:16 AM |
|
|
| jb |
Pug's analysis was very off... |
