|
|
| FPM C10 |
quote:
jb wrote:
Has anybody seen my old friend ss?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up over the hill
With Abraham, Martin and John...
Actually he called me last weekend to get together and watch the movie "Dig!", but I was busy.
I think he works all the damn time. What's up with THAT. |
|
|
| glencar |
quote:
jb wrote:
They are pretending to be something they are not-mucj like Keith these days...they are spoiled little girls ala Paris and Nicole....Patti must be ashamed they have broke the faith!!!
I think they're trying hard to look like those MaryKate & Ashley twins. I too am enraged! |
|
|
| jb |
ss=serious |
|
|
| BrianJonesForever |
You guys think any young thing is hot! They aren't very pretty-they look exactly like Keith. However, with the blond hair, and thin bodies, they are attractive. Well, at least I know being 22, thin and blonde is an asset, so i feel good hehe. |
|
|
| texile |
but what do i know? i'm just a fat, old, white haired broad who lives in a trailer park.....
[/quote]
really kath? WHITE hair...lol; |
|
|
| gypsy |
I think the photos are trashy and too forced. I don't think it's cool to have ciggies and beer in your hands while looking emaciated on heroin. I can't see Patti condoning that type of "modelling." They're both pretty girls, and I like the Vogue photos and interview they did a couple of years ago...it was much more natural. They're so much prettier when they aren't doing the "rock chick" thing. Anita did that years ago...maybe GQ should have published a current pic of Anita. |
|
|
| Angiegirl |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
Maybe GQ should have published a current pic of Anita.
LOL, now *that* would've been an art-statement! |
|
|
| kath |
well, poplar, not all of us are "poontang" oriented.
i guess if you had a daughter, would you want her to pose for pictures like that?
they have tons of money, they really don't need to be trashy, whether that is fashionable or not. |
|
|
| Poplar |
quote:
kath wrote:
well, poplar, not all of us are "poontang" oriented.
i guess if you had a daughter, would you want her to pose for pictures like that?
i am, proudly.
they're adults. period.
|
|
|
| Ten Thousand Motels |
quote:
kath wrote:
well, poplar, not all of us are "poontang" oriented.
We're not???  |
|
|
| kath |
well, i am adult. that doesn't mean i would want my daughter's name/picture associated with the word "poontang", tho....
to each his own....
[Edited by kath] |
|
|
| J.J.Flash |
HUBBA HUBBA!!!!!
Should I say what I was thinking .......
|
|
|
| luxury1 |
Well said, gypsy! |
|
|
| KeepRigidsLawyer |
These young ladies were clearly exploited and coerced to go along with someone's warped vision. One hard look should tell anyone as much. I feel compelled to pull a few strings in a noble attempt to get to the bottom of things.
KRsL |
|
|
| MrPleasant |
quote:
KeepRigidsLawyer wrote:
These young ladies were clearly exploited and coerced to go along with someone's warped vision. One hard look should tell anyone as much. I feel compelled to pull a few strings in a noble attempt to get to the bottom of things.
KRsL
Do I smell irony in that comment?
Alexandra and Theodora look creepy. |
|
|
| LadyJane |
EXTREMELY trashy...and...well...I like em!!!!
Keith's daughters.....come on!!!!!!
LJ. |
|
|
| Bloozehound |
quote:
Poplar wrote:
Sorry, but some of you sound like a bunch of church-going, god-fearing, poontang-hate'n bitches.
You telling me if you saw those two at a party you wouldn't be a little bit "interested?"
i agree with whoever said: "BOING!"
cold shower time.... er, maybe warm shower.
u tell'em sir popsalot
I'd like to take those 2 richard's gals and spin'em around my face and weenier like pinwheels
shee-at we might even get airborne with all those richard gal's poo000nthrust |
|
|
| texile |
true lj - but what funny is that thier really good girls from the east-coast suburbs....lol. |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
LadyJane wrote:
EXTREMELY trashy...and...well...I like em!!!!
Keith's daughters.....come on!!!!!!
LJ.
I like them too. They're pretty, and they have great personalities (from the interviews I've read). I just hate it when the magazines get them to pose like janky little drug addicts. It's not cute - it's exploitation.
And, no, I'm not one of those bible-thumping hypocrites. You guys can say all you want about having sex with the Stones' daughters. That's cool. They are sexy girls with great figures - and their dad's skinny legs, no?
I'm just saying that their pictorial is a bit over-the-top and isn't very artistic. Some shots are cutesy and artistic. I'd just like to see the photographers try something new and different in regards to posing the children of the Stones, because they seem to like having them all emulate their fathers, and it's pretty predictable by now. |
|
|
| FotiniD |
Well, actually, I like the shoot. I don't think it has to do with exploitation Gypsy, cause as said, they're adults, they're not 15-year-olds anymore and I'm sure they pretty well know what they're doing.
Also, I find it a little unfair that say, Keith can pose like Alex does in the black and white pic and everyone will go "wow, he looks great, what a rock 'n' roll picture, true to the myth" and so on and when Alex does it we find it trashy or bad for her reputation or whatever Remember guys, it's only a photo-shoot and it's not a Playboy one for Christ's sakes. What photographer in the world would take Keith Richards' daughters and have them pose what, in a church or Sunday reading? They're bound to want to play with the whole rock outlaw / junkie image and I find the results rather interesting.
But back to what strikes me most, the similarity is SHOCKING!  |
|
|
| Zeeta |
Anyway...I told you they were awesome!
I like the younger one best - Theodora, cute.
They are probrably better looking that the Woods girls and perhaps on a par with Lizzie Jagger et al.......? |
|
|
| BrianJonesForever |
Putting Anita in GQ?? Art-Statement is right, she's not looking so good these days, but thats what hard living will do to you |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
Zeeta wrote:
Anyway...I told you they were awesome!
I like the younger one best - Theodora, cute.
They are probrably better looking that the Woods girls and perhaps on a par with Lizzie Jagger et al.......?
Actually, Theodora is the older one. Alexandra is a year younger, but she is much taller than Theo. |
|
|
| telecaster |
quote:
gypsy wrote:
Actually, Theodora is the older one. Alexandra is a year younger, but she is much taller than Theo.
Good lord, are those the two little girls that were in "Lets Spend The Night Together?"
Can't be
|
|
|
| Joey |
quote:
telecaster wrote:
Good lord, are those the two little girls that were in "Lets Spend The Night Together?"
YESSIR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| glencar |
I agree with Gypsy here. These are beautiful girls. Why trash 'em up constantly? |
|
|
| texile |
telecaster wrote:
Good lord, are those the two little girls that were in "Lets Spend The Night Together?"
Can't be
that's right, it can't be - they were born in the mid-80s....weren't they?
|
|
|
| 72Tele |
Did your mom tell you what to do when you were 20? |
|
|
| KeepRigid |
quote:
telecaster wrote:
Good lord, are those the two little girls that were in "Lets Spend The Night Together?"
Can't be
Isn't Alex the little girl that steals Keith's boot at the end of Live At The Palladium? |
|
|
| gypsy |
quote:
72Tele wrote:
Did your mom tell you what to do when you were 20?
Yes. And she still tells me what to do. |
|
