April 28th, 2004 02:24 PM |
|
|
Dan |
If Tyler didnt have big lips Aerosmith would have never been compared to the Stones. Other than just being another rock and roll band, the similarities end there. Also dont forget the Stones started out as a cover band. Although Aero lost me a bit in the 90s, the last 2 shows I saw them 2 were probably the best Aero shows I had ever seen.
Brad and Joe have only gotten better as guitar players. Other than a keyboard player who occassionally plays saxaphone, they dont have a whole crew of sidemen to fall back on.
|
April 28th, 2004 06:08 PM |
|
|
ResidentMule |
would you rather have another Permanent Vacation or Get a Grip? nobody needs anything by Aerosmith outside of Rocks, and to a lesser extent, Toys in the Attic, and to an even lesser extent, Pump. they aren't exactly a band known for putting out musical masterpieces, though I'll give them credit for being entertaining. if you own those 3 albums, your all set. if you like some of their other ones, good for you. and if you don't like them at all, fuck off and go to another thread. but if your disappointed with the new one - how much could you be missing? I like the new album. its not as good as classic Aerosmith, but I don't want to see them backtracking entirely. its not really impressive musically, but if I want to be impressed I'll listen to Al DiMeola |
April 28th, 2004 06:10 PM |
|
|
ResidentMule |
"Brad and Joe have only gotten better as guitar players."
that's one thing I have to disagree with. Whitford's never played anything that stood out for me, and Joe Perry amazes me with how much talent a guitarist can lose over the years of constant touring (he started off at about a 6 out of 10)
I had no idea the keyboardist played sax too, that's true?
|
|