ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
A Bigger Bang Tour 2006

[ ROCKSOFF.ORG ] [ IORR NEWS ] [ SETLISTS 1962-2006 ] [ FORO EN ESPAŅOL ] [ BIT TORRENT TRACKER ] [ BIT TORRENT HELP ] [ BIRTHDAY'S LIST ] [ MICK JAGGER ] [ KEITHFUCIUS ] [ CHARLIE WATTS ] [ RONNIE WOOD ] [ BRIAN JONES ] [ MICK TAYLOR ] [ BILL WYMAN ] [ IAN "STU" STEWART ] [ NICKY HOPKINS ] [ MERRY CLAYTON ] [ IAN 'MAC' McLAGAN ] [ LINKS ] [ PHOTOS ] [ JIMI HENDRIX ] [ TEMPLE ] [ GUESTBOOK ] [ ADMIN ]
CHAT ROOM aka The Fun HOUSE Rest rooms last days
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
Register | Update Profile | F.A.Q. | Admin Control Panel

Topic: Pdog's Next Avatar? Return to archive Page: 1 2 3 4
24th April 2006 04:18 PM
rasputin56
quote:
pdog wrote:


Oh my god! LOL!!!


No, really.

[Edited by rasputin56]
24th April 2006 04:31 PM
kath i'm out of this discussion. my signature line remains.

i appreciate the admin understanding my point.

thanks voodoochile and gazza.

p.s. if any of you folks asking for my departure from the board or calling me "old" or whatever, if you wanna continue this, let's PM, ok?


[Edited by kath]
24th April 2006 04:46 PM
glimmercat
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
...I just dont think that pdogs avatar's are anything different than what you see in nearly every single rap video....



Just because it's prevalent doesn't make it right or good. The "music" is the first reason I avoid exposure to rap, but the rampant sexism in the videos is the second reason.

I find the double standard of nudity to be extremely offensive. Naked women everywhere you look, but it's "hurry, cover your eyes" if a naked man is on view! The idea that showing a naked woman is acceptable, but it's illegal [or deemed pornographic] to show a man having an erection, just reeks of hypocrisy.

I don't particularly want to see naked, jiggly women when I'm reading a Stones board, but if they're going to be here, at least have a little equality. Bring on the naked men!

Preferably looking as much like Mick as possible! None of those hairy-ape types, please.


meow
24th April 2006 04:51 PM
gustavobala ohh no....that girl do my day better
24th April 2006 04:51 PM
Ten Thousand Motels
quote:
glimmercat wrote:
I don't particularly want to see naked, jiggly women when I'm reading a Stones board, but if they're going to be here, at least have a little equality. Bring on the naked men!




Hell, why stop there? Some people might want to see a few pics of half naked transvestites blowing each other.....free speech you know.
24th April 2006 04:59 PM
Dick Bush Am I missing something here, am I eventually on the wrong board?!?

Weren't the Stones the purest ambassadors of sex, wasn't the sex their main message to the world, for not to speak of their exuberant lifestyle? wft!!

Should I now not link the videos with ass-shaking Mick, for the reasons of decency and morality? Dress my babes in chadors?

Lemme tellya something: it's not the CHICKS who get offended on the Stones board by the shaking bubblebutts - it's the envy of the fatassed burger women getting upset right here. They might be on the wrong board and listening quite wrong kind of music as well, no, really!




24th April 2006 05:01 PM
glimmercat
quote:
Ten Thousand Motels wrote:
Hell, why stop there? Some people might want to see a few pics of half naked transvestites blowing each other.....free speech you know.



Yeah and I'm one of them!!

Just post all the naked people you can find, as long as they have Stones tattoos/piercings/etc. That way we get the nudity and the Stones content. Cover all our bases.


meow
24th April 2006 05:08 PM
glimmercat
quote:
Dick Bush wrote:
....Should I now not link the videos with ass-shaking Mick....



Please do. Ass-shaking Mick is one of the best kinds!! There's definitely not enough of that on this board.

MORE MICK, please!


meow

[Edited by glimmercat]
24th April 2006 05:10 PM
pdog
quote:
kath wrote:
i'm out of this discussion. my signature line remains.

i appreciate the admin understanding my point.

thanks voodoochile and gazza.

p.s. if any of you folks asking for my departure from the board or calling me "old" or whatever, if you wanna continue this, let's PM, ok?


[Edited by kath]



Kath,
I respect you, and I find the attacks on you disgusting. Not only is your opinion, IMO, of the image that was up correct, I also think, if you were the only one bothered by it, in this case, that is enough to ask me to take it down, and that's what was done. Somethings don't need a majority opinion, to stand. It's a matter of respect. You have my sincerest apologies. It wasn't a case of boys being boys, it was Pdog being Pdog, and sometimes I need to be told, I did something stupid. I can handle it, I am often stupid, with a few moments of humor and brilliance mixed in.
24th April 2006 05:25 PM
kath pdog see PM.
24th April 2006 05:30 PM
lotsajizz
quote:
Altamont wrote:
Where was all the outrage when the chicks here posted pics of Mick's dick from the Performance flick?



the old hens were just happy with the Little Red Rooster!


24th April 2006 05:33 PM
glimmercat
quote:
lotsajizz wrote:
the old hens were just happy with the Little Red Rooster!





And we need MORE Little Mick!!


meow
24th April 2006 05:35 PM
Jumping Jack I don't care what you do, but some here really need to grow up and act like you actually have sex once in a while rather than day dreaming juvenile schoolboys.
24th April 2006 05:38 PM
Ten Thousand Motels
quote:
lotsajizz wrote:

you have offended what are clearly old hags.




That's not true. Old lady maybe but not a hag. That's Merle. Kath's a lady....an old hippie lady. Deal with it.
If you can't beat 'em join 'em.
24th April 2006 05:45 PM
Saint Sway
quote:
Ten Thousand Motels wrote:


That's not true. Old lady maybe but not a hag. That's Merle. Kath's a lady....an old hippie lady.



I thought old hippies were supposed to be open minded to displays of sexuality. You know, "free love" and all that good shit.
24th April 2006 05:53 PM
Saint Sway I love hot, young hippy chicks
24th April 2006 05:56 PM
kath saint sway see PM
24th April 2006 05:59 PM
Saint Sway shit. I just got called to the principals office...
24th April 2006 06:04 PM
LadyJane I think it's time to resurrect the "Show Us YOUR Faces thread."

Ya know so we can all make fun of each other's looks.

Everyone needs to lighten up.

Much ado about nothing. Stones Board.

Just don't disrepect other posters with the name calling. Are we all 12????

LJ.
24th April 2006 06:25 PM
kath well, what a load.

here's where i am coming from. you can take it down if you want, but it is something to consider when you post stuff(which by the way I never called it porn in the first place) that can be offensive.

as a victim of long term sexual abuse, i am very sensitive to women being reduced to "holes", either in film or in pictures or just in speaking of them. neither do i find it amusing to think of men as simply a penis with a body attached to it.

we are people, with our own feelings and attitudes and sensitivities. i think that's what we need to remember. RESPECT.

please try to remember that there are human beings typing these posts here, and we all have our own stories (i can already hear the "boo-hoos" being typed now because i mentioned the abuse) that make us who we are.

now, back to PM's. and i have to go work in my soon-to-be-stupendous flower garden!!!
24th April 2006 06:33 PM
Saint Sway
quote:
kath wrote:

now, back to PM's. and i have to go work in my soon-to-be-stupendous flower garden!!!



the flower garden sounds much more interesting and stimulating than this thread.

enjoy
24th April 2006 06:39 PM
kath yeah, it is!!!!! i call it "guerilla gardening".

i dump as much dirt and potting soil and peat moss and "steer manure" on the plot as i can, add leaves, mulch my brains out for a few weeks, and then throw as many kinds of seeds out there as i think will work, and plop in as many bulbs as i think might bloom.

then, in the spring, i have a big surprise puzzle coming up (did i actually INTEND to plant that?) and "WTF is THAT??"

it's fun....i love to play in the dirt. another sign of being an old hippie i guess...from the communal living days......
[Edited by kath]
24th April 2006 06:41 PM
Saint Sway www.newearthmud.net
24th April 2006 06:49 PM
SweetVirginia
quote:
Dick Bush wrote:

Should I now not link the videos with ass-shaking Mick, for the reasons of decency and morality?




Surely you can see the difference between a link
and the in-your-face photo or avatar post.

It appears that Voodoo and Gazza got several complaints,
but Kath was the only one who respected all of you guys
enough to come on and try to explain why she was not
comfortable with the avatar and why she complained. And for that she gets labeled a "conservative Republican" and and "old hag".

Good grief.

SV

24th April 2006 06:58 PM
kath maybe i should post my old police mug shots from decades ago....

my new avatar, thankfully, is not one of them......


but it COULD have been!!
24th April 2006 07:01 PM
gimmekeef In hindsight it was dumb to start this thread.Didnt mean to rile folks up or have ill blood.How long until Europe?..sorry to those that felt offended...
24th April 2006 07:07 PM
kath i have to admit, i chuckeled when i read the word "hindsight"....
24th April 2006 07:30 PM
rasputin56
quote:
And for that she gets labeled a "conservative Republican"


Nobody deserves that. Nobody. Well, unless they really are one and in that case that would be too nice. But calling someone who really isn't one that, that would be low.

And kudos for Kath standing up and saying enough. It kept me from posting a few things that definitely would have been construed as not suitable for everyone.

While we're at it, is the boob self-jiggler girl a bit too much?
[Edited by rasputin56]
24th April 2006 07:43 PM
kath well, frankly...i think we've all seen it now......

and she is enjoying herself WAAAYYYYY too much!!!!

24th April 2006 08:12 PM
Highwire Rob I think a Spinal Tap moment is in order...

Nigel responding to allegations of "sexist" lyrics in their song Big Bottom:

quote:
"It's not like we're saying women are this or women are that. We are merely making, if you like, a scientific study of the bun."




Bobbi Flekman: Ian, Ian, you put a greased, naked girl on all fours with a dog collar around her neck ...

Ian Faith: - Yes, a dog collar ...

Bobbi Flekman: - and a leash ...

Ian Faith: - A leash ...

Bobbi Flekman: - and a man's arm holding on to the leash extended out to here shoving a black glove in her face to sniff it, and you don't find that sexist? You don't find that offensive?

Ian Faith: No, I don't find that offensive: this is 1982 -!
Bobbi Flekman: You're darn right, 'this is 1982,' we don't have this mentality any more; get out of the sixties -!

Ian Faith: Well, you should have seen the cover they wanted to do; it wasn't a glove, I can assure you!

Page: 1 2 3 4
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:

PicoSearch
The Rolling Stones World Tour 2005 Rolling Stones Bigger Bang Tour 2005 2006 Rolling Stones Forum - Rolling Stones Message Board - Mick Jagger - Keith Richards - Brian Jones - Charlie Watts - Ian Stewart - Stu - Bill Wyman - Mick Taylor - Ronnie Wood - Ron Wood - Rolling Stones 2005 Tour - Farewell Tour - Rolling Stones: Onstage World Tour A Bigger Bang US Tour

NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
Enter artist an start searching using "Power Search" (RECOMMENDED)