ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board

Ed Caraeff
WEBRADIO CHANNELS:
[Ch1: Sike-ay-delic 60's] [Ch2: Random Sike-ay-delia] [Ch3: British Invasion]

[THE WET PAGE] [IORR NEWS] [SETLISTS 62-99] [THE A/V ROOM] [THE ART GALLERY] [MICK JAGGER] [KEITHFUCIUS] [CHARLIE WATTS ] [RON WOOD] [BRIAN JONES] [MICK TAYLOR] [BILL WYMAN] [IAN STEWART ] [NICKY HOPKINS] [MERRY CLAYTON] [LISA FISCHER] [DARRYL JONES] [BOBBY KEYS] [JAMES PHELGE] [LINKS] [PHOTOS] [MAGAZINE COVERS] [MUSIC COVERS ] [JIMI HENDRIX] [BOOTLEGS] [TEMPLE] [GUESTBOOK] [ADMIN]

[CHAT ROOM aka THE FUN HOUSE] [RESTROOMS]

NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
Enter artist an start searching using "Power Search" (RECOMMENDED) inside.
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:

PicoSearch

ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
Register | Update Profile | F.A.Q. | Admin Control Panel

Topic: Life Magazine Return to archive
03-27-02 02:38 PM
Maxlugar I saw on the news stand yesterday that Life has a new issue called something like "Rock and Roll at 50".

The cover is a face pafe shot of Elvis. Fair enough. He IS the king and it does harken back to Rock and Roll's infancy.

Along the bottom are smaller pictures:

Paul McCartney and John Lennon (Two Beatles. One is never enough of course!)
Michael Jackson
Madonna
and someone else.

No Stones.

You think they'd want someone on the cover that started long ago and that is still vital in Rock's 50th year?

Fuck no!

03-27-02 02:57 PM
nankerphelge That just isn't right.
They ought to call it "Get a Life" magazine
03-27-02 03:09 PM
Joey They should have put a picture of Pete Townshend on the cover .............kissing Mick Jagger !!!!!

03-27-02 04:37 PM
gypsy Madonna? Madonna doesn't even belong on the cover...she is not at all rock-n-roll! And, fifty years....I don't think so...thirty years ago, she was in her groupie phase, stalking Mr. Jagger...wonder if he enjoyed her 'wolf puss'...
03-27-02 04:47 PM
nankerphelge I'll bet she's always shaved it in the shape of a cross.
03-27-02 05:49 PM
Maxlugar Gypsy,

It was about Rock and Roll turning 50 not the performers but yeah, Madonna does not belong there. At least I think it was Madonna. I'll have to go look for it again.

Maxy
03-27-02 06:17 PM
JaggaRichards
quote:
nankerphelge wrote:
I'll bet she's always shaved it in the shape of a cross.



bet she shaved it off for Lent
03-27-02 08:46 PM
gypsy she didn't even shave her pits...yuck...I wasn't saying it like Madonna wasn't around for fifty years...what I meant is that she is not at all rock and roll...why, they might as well have put Britney on the cover...
03-27-02 08:50 PM
gypsy Okay, can you guys think of other females that are more deserving than Madonna to make it on the cover of Life?

I'll start a list:

-Janis Joplin
-Chrissie Hynde
-Blondie
-Bonnie Raitt
-Stevie Nicks
-Ann & Nancy Wilson

And, no more "wolf puss" discussions...please...
03-27-02 10:15 PM
nanky Agreed, no WP discussions
That's a good way to lose a whole damn thread.

Gotta tell ya - it's been a hell of a birthday
In no small measure to all y'all that wished me a happy one -- I sure do appreciate it

Went out with the family for Mexican fajita Corona fest.
It was mucho goodo.
I don't know a lick of Spanish.

I was hoping for my birthday that we'd get some word - something, however small, about the tour.

Nothing.

I hoped
I prayed
I subpoenaed

Nothing worked

What am I to do?
Oh, what am I to do!

Then I'm thinking -- hey, I'm still a spring chicken at 39. Mick & Keith are 20 years older yet. They just aren't moving as fast. Yeah, that's it -- maybe they haven't announced a tour because they "forgot" about it. Yeah - dementia.
Mick's tired too. Yeah, you heard me Jagger. ZZZZZZZZ.

I dare y'all to annouce a tour!!
You guys haven't got the hair on yer ass to announce a tour.

See if that works.
Right?
Read the headline:

"STONES FAN FUCKING DARES THE BAND TO TOUR"

It would actually say that.

(GULP of Corona)

AHHHHHHH

Does everyone think they need to do something different?
I think they need to make it fresh somehow.
The small stage was great -- and any variations on it could be great. In '94 they had that extendable stage for the accoustic set.

One thing I liked about the No Security tour was you saw the band. I didn't so much like the way they made Bobby Keys huff and puff up the stairs for his parts, but hey -- Bobby's had some fun hasn't he. Fucker knows where the party's at eh? Damn right he does. And I don't care what anyone says, the Stones eat that raunchy sax up. Nothing against EW in '81 or whomever, but Bobby secretes PheroStones and TestosterStones, and Whoremoans, and y'know -- Bobby's been there.

Can you imagine having to be on the road with the Stones for 50 shows in 3 months in '81 and on the last date, your birthday coincides with Keith's? Fucker has been there.

GULP

The missus is sound asleep
Should I scare the shit out of her?
Nah, that'd be a real dick move, huh?
It'd be funny as hell though.

Oh my poor empty Corona
Oh should I have yet another?
Yes, hang on
Ah - I'm back with a fresh Corona
I hope at least some of you are getting "pissed" too!









What do y'all think they can do this time out that they haven't done before.



























03-27-02 11:06 PM
Cardinal Ximinez "wolf puss" discussions...please...

Well, OK gypsy, since you said please

-Janis Joplin
Like I said before, you would think so, but no...

-Chrissie Hynde
She shaved her's into a mohawk...

-Blondie
You would think she would have shaved hers, or trimmed it down, but noooooooo...she did a "Flock Of Seagulls" doo on hers...damn thing could put an eye out!

-Bonnie Raitt
Oh yeah...

-Stevie Nicks
NOT a "natural" blonde....

-Ann & Nancy Wilson
Ann no, Nancy yeah...

Oh, and Nanky...what could they do for this tour to improve it? Give us All-Access passes, that would damn sure improve things for us anyhow!
03-27-02 11:25 PM
Jaxx quote:
gypsy wrote:
...wonder if he enjoyed her 'wolf puss'...

quote:
gypsy wrote:
And, no more "wolf puss" discussions...please...
[/quote

its obvious you have a self esteem problem. do you also have a multiple personality disorder? you bring that OFFTOPIC sleaze into a discussion and then request that it stop? just cut the crap. all of it. there's plenty of porn boards out there for your type. quit flooding this board, please!




[quote]gypsy wrote:
And, no more "wolf puss" discussions...please...

03-28-02 12:31 AM
KeepRigid Hey, don't be mean to gypsy! I don't see any virtue in substituting personal attacks for sleaze.

So she mentioned something then asked that it be dropped in the next breath, I seriously doubt any of it was intended to be taken too literally.







[Edited by KeepRigid]
03-28-02 12:56 AM
Jaxx [quote]KeepRigid wrote:
I don't see any virtue in substituting personal attacks for sleaze.

personal attacks?.i call them as i see them.

i'm bored and tired with the disgusting off topic converstion initiated by this "person". how kind of you to defend her. as outspoken as she is, i believe she can defend herself.

you haven't seen the mail i've been getting complaining about her flooding and her off topic posts. they are offensive to many of our regulars here

>>>So she mentioned something then asked that it be dropped in the next breath, I seriously doubt any of it was intended to be taken too literally.

that is what the delete button is for. she should use it if she continues to post here without thinking first. whether or not it is to be taken literally is not the point. that filth does not belong on this forum. having dis"gust" her posts with my fellow moderators, i know where they stand on this.

btw, if you notice, the p--- wolf thread has been deleted because it is extremely off topic and has offended others.


[Edited by Jaxx]
03-28-02 01:10 AM
KeepRigid Hey, don't be mean to KeepRigid!

When I said "don't be mean to gypsy", I didn't mean "be mean to KeepRigid"! This was not the intention AT ALL!


"how kind of you to defend her."

I figure if anyone's going to get banned for speaking out...well, I mean, no one really reads the tripe I post here anyway.


"you haven't seen the mail i've been getting complaining about her flooding and her off topic posts. they are offensive to many of our regulars here"

I'm not questioning your motives, only your methods. I just didn't see any reason to start making judgements about other members.

People, I implore you...why does everyone have to be so unhappy in the absence of sleaze? (Did I just answer my own question?)


"btw, if you notice, the p--- wolf thread has been deleted because it is extremely off topic and has offended others."

Actually, I didn't notice...seeing as how I hadn't been reading the thread in the first place. (Shame on your regulars!)
03-28-02 06:54 AM
nanky I think everyone outght to lighten up a bit

First off gypsy didn't start the whole wolf puss thing, only the topless thing. and she wasn't the only one involved -- a bunch of us were including me.

second, since when did all the "regulars" (am I am irregular?) at a Stones board get so fucking tight. And if they are so fucking offended, why sit back secretly grumbling to the administrators rather than voice their opinions openly -- are the regulars of so little backbone they can't speak their mind or are you overstating the number of people offended?

third, the day after the wolf puss thread is pulled, you guys put up a header picture and caption about Mick blowing his big fat wad of hot steamy jizz down his wife's throat or all over her neck. So Wolf Puss is no good but references to ejaculation on women is okay. yeah okay, i get it -- that makes complete sense.

If we are going to have a double standard, can you please provide us irregulars we the list of "in-our-opinion-this-is-not-quite-as-offensive-off-topic material" that we can discuss without getting in trouble. Or is it that if we tie wolf puss to a caption, it is suddenly on topic?

A bit petty?



03-28-02 11:40 AM
gypsy I don't know why nudity is such a sore spot with some people...It's not a bad thing at all...sure, we got off topic...but, it was a contest...it was all in good fun...nudity is harmless...nudity over violence any day...
03-28-02 12:29 PM
KeepRigid "I don't know why nudity is such a sore spot with some people...nudity is harmless"

Well, I guess I can see both sides of the argument. I suppose we've all gotten a little sore because of nudity at one point or another.
03-28-02 12:56 PM
~AzQb
quote:
nankerphelge wrote:
That just isn't right.
They ought to call it "Get a Life" magazine





Ahhhhh.....there's a GoodOne, Nanky boy. Now, happy belated birthday from a royal in a struggle of a lifetime ! You may not understand me half the time, and i've been pained by that, but hopefully i'm a bit more "clarified" for you. Like Butta ; )

~
03-28-02 01:04 PM
TomL When we all get together we'll all get naked?
03-28-02 04:49 PM
Jaxx hi everyone and thanks for your opinion. i do have a life, and i don't think i'm being petty and i don't have a problem with nudity.

it might surprise you to know that i have personally written alot of the sicker "keithfucious" sayings and also some of the racier captions you see on some of our headers. this board is somewhat of a contact place with a reputation for good stones information. we get alot of underage folks reading our board. all i'm asking for is some freedom of speech with responsibility.

if you have found me to be mean, it was not my intention, i just thing you all are going over the top. considering i am a comoderator here i felt that my dissatisfaction was worth posting. could i have handled it better? yeah. but the on and on and on of last week really caught up with me. much mail has been exchanged between me and my other 2 partners in crime.

we've tried to maintain a certain flavor around here for the last 3years. this board has been predominately news, boots and information with sexual innuendo and double entendre, sick jokes and some rock star nudies.

its not a problem that things have morphed into a more chat thing. the issue for me is that some of the discussions of late have been quite tasteless. is this not ONLY MY opinion. what i will say, and i'm only speaking for myself here, is that i personally find show me your tits for boots, talking about croTches, breasts, little red roosters and posting our members in their birthday suits to be inappropriate for the type of forum this is. that's all. sexual smut doesn't need to be constantly interjected. i find it off topic and i personally don't find it funny.

i know alot of you from stonesworld way back when where i only lurked around. we've all been around here for awhile coexisting here there and everywhere and now you found yourself in our house. i just wanted to let you know that we are trying to maintain a certain atmosphere around here and i hope you guys and gals can respect that.

now lets party!


[Edited by Jaxx]
03-28-02 06:55 PM
Maxlugar My Dear Stonesian friend, Jaxx,

I have had a few beers but before I turn into Franken-Maxy, I just wanted to say I love you.

If you were here at Casa De Maxy tonight, I would hold you tight to my heaving bosom and stroke your worried mind and say "Jaxx, you have not gone over the top, that is my job. Why, I've been using these platforms to make an ass of myself for over five years. There, there.... Maxy knows and feels your pain."

You see, Jaxx, I know what it is like to have an unpopular opinion of the world. I'm the Rockin' Republican, remember? Let the slings and arrows smite Maxy's sphincter early and often, it doesn't matter.

So, Jaxx, hold your Kinky Kink Kinko Kinkily, Anus Immobilizer up proud!

I have grown so close to all of you.....shit, it is sometimes scary. All I can say is......oh hell, I can't say it. I have to SING it!

I love you dirty fucker
da da da da da
Sister and a brother
da da da da da
Moanin' in the moonlight
da da da da da
Singin' for their suppa'
da da da DA!

I'll never say I've HAD IT, HAD IT, HAD IT...HAD IT WITH YOUUUUU!!!

I love you all!

Maxlugar, Member of The CLEVELAND 10 (soon to be Franken-Maxy!)
03-28-02 09:01 PM
~AzQb


Yers truly, Jaxx, has ALways aDORed yer arse ! i find you not only a giggle worthy chick { which is quite a compliment in itself !} but also a fair, democratic, sympathetic web "mistress".

I would also find it delightful to one day meet up. At one of the East Coast shows this autumn, perhaps ? Why, i'd love it.

You intrigue. You cause people to THINK.

Yer much loved indeed.

~
03-29-02 06:17 PM
Jaxx
oh, a sonnet and an invitation! this is indeed turning into a fine day on the cusp of the full moon. i've got the fever. can you feel the love? nyc is a pretty sure thing pour moi. my sis has a ped-a-terre up in midtown and i am hoping to do the nyc pro party tour.
04-01-02 02:38 PM
~AzQb

Hey

I'll be there, baby ; )
04-01-02 03:31 PM
~AzQb

third, the day after the wolf puss thread is pulled, you guys put up a header picture and caption about Mick blowing his big fat wad of hot steamy jizz down his wife's throat or all over her neck. So Wolf Puss is no good but references to ejaculation on women is okay. yeah okay, i get it -- that makes complete sense.

If we are going to have a double standard, can you please provide us irregulars we the list of "in-our-opinion-this-is-not-quite-as-offensive-off-topic material" that we can discuss without getting in trouble. Or is it that if we tie wolf puss to a caption, it is suddenly on topic?

A bit petty? - nankerphelge (quote)

Nanky. Baby.

I am soooooooooooo confused, really, and you've given "voice" to my thoughts on all of this crap. If there is indeed a double standard, which quite obviously there IS, we "irregular regulars" should be informed of what is acceptable, and what is simply not appropriate, and given free Ex-Lax on top of it all; of a quickness. Again, this entire situation has me QUiTe confused, and, again, i myself was a part of the "Topless Tittie Talking Brigade". It was cheerful double entendre, funny in itself, and absolutely amusing. There seemed to have been no intentional callousness, and all seemed to be enjoying themselves.

I don't understand this, really, and instead of bemoaning it, i've simply decided to agree with said nanker and be done with it. You've brought clarity, brother.

Thank you.Your help has brought to me {previously} underestimated cheer; in all seriousness i didn't know quite how to put into words what i was "seeing". Thanks again ; )

~





04-01-02 09:31 PM
Jaxx
quote:
~AzQb wrote:
>>you guys put up a header picture and caption about Mick blowing his big fat wad of hot steamy jizz down his wife's throat or all over her neck.

let me try again.

swallow, skin flute, ephamisms that "elude to" and not blatant describing such as your terminology of hot steamy jizz.
>>So Wolf Puss is no good but references to ejaculation on women is okay.

key word here is references, wolf puss is fairly blatant

>>If we are going to have a double standard, can you please provide us irregulars we the list of "in-our-opinion-this-is-not-quite-as-offensive-off-topic material" that we can discuss without getting in trouble. Or is it that if we tie wolf puss to a caption, it is suddenly on topic?

i'm sorry if it appears to be a double standard. that is not the intention. once in a while voodoo goes over the top in the gross direction. unfortunately i don't have a chance to check the board and the header everyday. in the past when i have found things to be offensive i have changed or deleted.


A bit petty? - nankerphelge (quote)

i don't think so. we pay for this space here and i think as administrators we are entitled to vocalize our opinion. for the most part i am pretty invisible around here except for some news items. but you're entitled to your opinion. like i said in my previous post, bathroom wall talk on this forum is not what we're about. all that off topic crass conversation floods away good info. as a result, i don't think my opinion is petty.

>>I am soooooooooooo confused,

>> "irregular regulars" should be informed of what is acceptable, and what is simply not appropriate,

let me try to alleviate the confusion. this is a rolling stones forum. we like to be informative, connect folks up, trade boots and party while we talk about partying. before i post i personally ask myself:

1. is this stones related
2. is this good information
3. could i sit down and read this board with a teenager?

is this everyone's standard? no. IMO posting anything not stones related is technically flooding. however, the trials and tribulations of you self proclaimed irregular regulars adds an interesting spin and a form of entertainment for yourselves and others. we're thrilled to have you here. i'm agile enough to accept this slight change of format, for the amusement factor. please, enjoy yourselves. i'm just asking that you use freedom of speech with responsibility. this is supposed to be fun, but it doesn't have to be gross. creative use of ephamisms would help out tremendously....LOL



[Edited by Jaxx]
04-02-02 12:16 AM
~AzQb


Jaxx ; )

I completely understand. And thank you for the message & clarification; every little bit helps in navigating this sometimes hellish state called "cyberspace" !

; )

~Much love


On June 16, 2001 the hit counter of the WET page was inserted here, it had 174,489 hits. Now the hit counter is for both the page and the board. The hit counter of the ITW board had 1,127,645 hits when it was closed and the Coolboard didn't have hit counter but was on line only two months and a half.