quote:

---

glencar wrote:
That partick line was on the Shield last week. I hadn't heard it before then so I thought you got it from there. Besides this round & round is boring me. I mean, the diea that Cheney's going to resign or that the media isn't dishonest/biased or that Joey cares about this country? We've done this all before & this round's not as inneresting. Cazart!

---

quote:

---

lotsajizz wrote:
I am reciprocal...nothing more, nothing less....

---

quote:

---

glencar wrote:
You know they threw an anti-war rally on Sunday in Times Square & only 200 people showed up. NYC has 8 million peopel & a few thousand tourists & all they could get was 200 people? 200 people show up in NYC when Trump walks out of his tower.

---

quote:

---

pdog wrote:

---

quote:

---

lotsajizz wrote:
an opinion...Telecaster's political opinions are out of step with the being a true Rolling Stones' fan
and he resorts to the ad hominem when substance escapes him

which is always


OK now

Cazart!!!

---

quote:

---

FPM C10 wrote:


"(Editor's Note: This document is handwritten and has no official seal...The document does not establish that the two parties did in fact enter into an operational relationship}"

"(Editor's Note: The controversial claim that Osama bin Laden was cooperating with Saddam Hussein is an ongoing matter of intense debate. While the assertions contained in this document clearly support the claim, the sourcing is questionable — i.e. an unnamed Afghan "informant" reporting on a conversation with another Afghan "consul." The date of the document — four days after 9/11 — is worth noting but without further corroboration, this document is of limited evidentiary value.)"

"(Editor's note: This document indicates that the Iraqis were aware of and interested in reports that members of al Qaeda were present in Iraq in 2002. The document does not support allegations that Iraq was colluding with al Qaeda.)"

****

Oh yeah. It's a SLAM-DUNK.

It must be sad trying to make excuses for this war which even your clueless leader doesn't believe anymore, if he ever did. I particularly like the document which shows Saddam sending guys out to try to find some al Qeda operatives. If they were in cahoots, would that be necessary?

And you thank GOD for this war? GOD????

What God is that?

---

quote:

---

lotsajizz wrote:
an opinion...Telecaster's political opinions are out of step with the being a true Rolling Stones' fan
and he resorts to the ad hominem when substance escapes him

which is always


OK now

Cazart!!!

---

quote:

---

Reginald Denny wrote:

---

quote:

---

telecaster wrote:


Deep man, deep Jizzy

You are a true thinker

No wonder why your candidate Lyndon LaRouche never won anything

Why is it like being on the losing side 100% of the time?

Let us know

It must get tiresome

---

quote:

---

pdog wrote:
Republicans assert dominance in the bedroom
Magazine article researches which party rates better at sex
Updated: 4:06 p.m. ET March 23, 2006

Republicans control Congress and the White House. According to an informal study in the latest issue of “GQ” magazine, the GOP is also asserting its dominance over Democrats in the bedroom.

The anonymous author, who wrote the piece for “GQ” reports “After years of intensive research on both sides of the aisle, I’m here to report that Republican men are infinitely better to have sex with.”

The article in the April issue of “GQ” lays out 10 reasons why Republicans are better and kinkier in the sack.

“GQ” deputy editor, Michael Hainey joined Tucker Carlson on ‘Situation’ to explain the magazine’s findings.



TUCKER CARLSON, HOST, ‘SITUATION’: This is so good. She says—whoever this woman is—I asked you in the commercial break who it was. You would not reveal her name, but I’m kind of in love I have to say, because she writes very well.

She says of Democrats, they’re so emotional and sensitive and genuinely care about your day and how you feel and how you felt yesterday. Is there anything you need, they whimper? Oh shut up, she says.

MICHAEL HAINEY, DEPUTY EDITOR, “GQ”: Right.

CARLSON: They’re too sensitive to be good; that’s her point.

HAINEY: Right. I think, you know, it’s funny. I think she does a great job of saying what I think a lot of Democrats feel. I don’t you. You and I are the same age, but we grew up believing the Democratic Party is the party of JFK, a very randy and virile party.

CARLSON: Yes.

HAINEY: And just like most domestic issues, the Republicans vaulted over the Democrats, you know, and slowly taken what was once their sort of right, which was the sort of party of free love, if you might say. And they’ve become the more virile party. It’s a national disgrace, if you ask me.

CARLSON: Because, in fact, guilt and politics are both the enemies of sex.

HAINEY: Right.

CARLSON: And she makes that point. She has a line in here about Republicans. They understand that foreplay is about sex and lots of it. Democrats are too busy checking if the condoms you keep by the bed are good for the environment.

HAINEY: True. I think she also makes a great point that, you know, Republicans, they’re great on dates, because you know, they’ll just spend and they won’t care about, you know, who pays the bill. So once again, they sort of like spend, have a good time and they’ll worry about it later.

CARLSON: Now, you edit a men’s magazine, so I know you spend a lot of time thinking about the relationship between men and women.

HAINEY: Right.

CARLSON: You really get the sense that this woman is probably a Democrat, probably some center left, you know, kind of moderate Democrat. And for that reason, probably in name a feminist, but everything she says is kind of antifeminist.

She makes the point that men who don’t decide or proclaim where you’re having dinner are wusses. And there’s nothing less appealing than a wuss. Whatever happened to the kind of, you know, the feminist view that we go Dutch on dinner and we, you know, come to a group decision on things like that?

HAINEY: I think she’s simply saying, you know, maybe she’s more of a Hillary Clinton. She wants a stronger man there. I don’t think you should be threatened, Tucker.

CARLSON: I’m not threatened at all. I’m kind of aroused, honestly. I mean, she likes Republicans, because they have no conscience and they’re less sensitive.

HAINEY: Exactly, yes, and because you know, they have no regard for who’s going to be going into debt or anything. She’s like, you know, they come in. They take control. They tell you what they want to do. And I guess she’s found out that’s very attractive to a woman.

CARLSON: “A Republican man will never, ever cry,” she writes. I remember when I was little, like in the ‘70s, long before I was dating, but there was this idea that men who laid out their emotions for women, who wept, you know, and really empathized deeply, and basically acted like Clinton used to in speeches, were irresistible to women. Do you think that’s true?

HAINEY: I think, you know, she’s pointing out that, you know, too many of the Jimmy Carter-Alan Alda era coming off of there in the ‘70s. And you know, Reagan, once again, sort of like set the standard for, you know, what a strong sort of like virile man, a strong and silent type is, you know. And you mentioned Clinton. I mean, the guy obviously had his charms and ways of using them.


[Edited by pdog]

---

quote:

---

Reginald Denny wrote:


Passive agressive types make lousy lovers. I never bed them in the big rig. Who needs the baggage?

---

quote:

---

Riffhard wrote:


SheRat Maxy posted the source as ABC News. This is the same network that today was exposed by Drudge with an e-mail from a top producer in which he said,"I hate Bush...he makes me want to puke!"

So when the US military releases these documents that are then released to ABC News I take very little stock in "their" editors opinions. They have proven over and over again that they have an agenda. It's a safe bet that ABC is never going to give the bennefit of the doubt to the current admin. or the US military.



Riffy

---

quote:

---

pdog wrote:


what's a noobie?

---

quote:

---

Reginald Denny wrote:


word?

---

quote:

---

pdog wrote:
And you know, Reagan, once again, sort of like set the standard for, you know, what a strong sort of like virile man

---

quote:

---

SheRat wrote:

I mean, I can see where someone would think W is sexy. But Reagan? Who wanted to see his shriveled old pecker?

---

quote:

---

Reginald Denny wrote:


So would I be wasting my time if I tried to cyber-tap dat ass?




[Edited by Reginald Denny]

---

quote:

---

SheRat wrote:



None of that is the point, Riff. The point is don't use sources that actively discredit your point to support your point.

It's very simple, really.

---

quote:

---

Riffhard wrote:

The only reason they won't believe it is because it would bolster the claim made by the Bush admin.,and they will never allow for that possibility. Truth be damned.


Riffy

---

quote:

---

glencar wrote:
One's politics have little to no connection with one's musical taste.

---

quote:

---

SheRat wrote:

Personally, Riff, I don't believe any damn thing the goverment tells us--no matter who is in the White House.

---