|
Poison Dart |
This sucks.
The Stones have been on the road together now for nearly two years and they can't put an album together?
Yet there is yet another Jagger record already in the can. WTF? Keith would never have allowed this in the good old days.
While I like Mick's solo stuff more than some people what's the point?
A new Jagger solo record isn't going to make a dent in the charts (hopefully it sells more than 1k copies in England on it's first day of release. Talk about embarrassing)and it is going to just make it longer between Stones releases.
If Mick has an entirely new batch of songs why not just make them into new Stones stuff?
It looks like we won't see new Stones music now until at least the late summer of 2008 (then tour behind it which is their business model) or more likely 2009. If ever.
Again I say.
THIS SUCKS!!!!! |
|
Saint Sway |
I dont care if Mick releases 8 more sucky solo albums
I just cant bare another lame Stones record |
|
fireontheplatter |
this has already been discused..it is because keith richards is a lazy sod and doesn't give a toss.
oy vey |
|
gimmekeef |
Maybe Mick actually ran them by Keith and Keith said.."ahhhh be my guest"...? |
|
Saint Sway |
quote: gimmekeef wrote:
Maybe Mick actually ran them by Keith and Keith said.."ahhhh be my guest"...?
Thats Hall of Fame P-O-S-T-I-N!!! |
|
BILL PERKS |
IF DAVE STEWART PRODUCES I'LL GET IT |
|
Gazza |
quote: fireontheplatter wrote:
this has already been discused..it is because keith richards is a lazy sod and doesn't give a toss.
oy vey
..and the ironic thing is that when it comes out, guess who will be it's biggest critic... |
|
Poison Dart |
Keith is letting the band down. |
|
speedfreakjive |
keith most likely doesn't feel there's the creative spark there now IMO, lets not criticise a band which has lasted longer than anyone expected and has put out by enlarge above average output. |
|
Sir Stonesalot |
>If Mick has an entirely new batch of songs why not just make them into new Stones stuff?<
Turn Jagger solo tunes into a Stones record?
Hmmmmmmm....wait a minute. This sounds framiliar....
Yeah, they already did that once. It's called "A Bigger Bang". And it sucked.
Go Mick. Do that solo thing. And thanks for not putting the Stones "brand" on it this time. |
|
Dan |
Because even real bands (which the Stones haven't been in over 2 decades) don't even put out albums less than every 2-3 years any more. |
|
Soldatti |
quote: Poison Dart wrote:
If Mick has an entirely new batch of songs why not just make them into new Stones stuff?
Please, not another ABB again!
quote: Poison Dart wrote:
It looks like we won't see new Stones music now until at least the late summer of 2008 (then tour behind it which is their business model) or more likely 2009. If ever.
The last part is more likely.
[/quote] |
|
Gimme Shelter |
Its just that lately it seems Mick is concerned with the bottom line that being $. A new Stones album would sell more than a new solo album. |
|
Dan |
quote: Gimme Shelter wrote:
Its just that lately it seems Mick is concerned with the bottom line that being $. A new Stones album would sell more than a new solo album.
But the recent Stones album barely went gold so you figure a new one so soon would unlikely do even half that. So you figure a solo album may be even more profitible to his bottom line as you don't have to split the take 4 ways.
Also, any new contract negotiations for releasing/distributing a new studio album would be based on ABB's sales so they would unlikely get much of an advance. Back when they inked the Virgin deal, they were still selling a few million of each release. |
|
mojoman |
why not? its just another vanity project |
|
Gimme Shelter |
Maybe they need to start releasing what is in the vaults. We need a DVD of "Ladies & Gentelman" |
|
Mickijaggeroo |
Keith is pissed at Mick cause of this, thatīs why there is no proper pressconference, just Mick. |
|
Poison Dart |
The good news is that it sounds like the album is nearly done.
So hopefully he will be on to his next musical project (new Stones stuff) pretty soon.
I'd bet that we may get some Stones music on the Scorsese film soundtrack. |
|
Gazza |
quote: Mickijaggeroo wrote:
Keith is pissed at Mick cause of this, thatīs why there is no proper pressconference, just Mick.
I would imagine hes known for quite some time that Mick was working on a solo release. Its not like he cooked it up just last week.
besides, Mick working on a solo release during Stones downtime doesnt interfere with the Stones' plans. That, plus he probably wont tour with it either. |
|
Gazza |
quote: Gimme Shelter wrote:
Its just that lately it seems Mick is concerned with the bottom line that being $. .
"Lately" ??? What - since 1969? |
|
MikeyC613 |
Good for Mick. Keep doing solo albums. Keith will wish he had his twilight period. |
|
Gazza |
quote: Poison Dart wrote:
Keith is letting the band down.
wouldnt go that far. You cant force songs out of the man if the muse or desire isnt there. The end product would simply be horrible. However, if Mick feels creative enough its his right to do what the hell he wants.
I dont feel that the Stones owe the world another record anyway. Anything at this point is a bonus. |
|
Gazza |
quote: BILL PERKS wrote:
IF DAVE STEWART PRODUCES I'LL GET IT
Stewart isnt involved with it at all, apparently |
|
fireontheplatter |
quote: Gimme Shelter wrote:
Maybe they need to start releasing what is in the vaults. We need a DVD of "Ladies & Gentelman"
here here....iu have seen that once ages ago. i would so love to see it again, that and lets spend the night together. |
|
Paranoid_Android |
quote: Saint Sway wrote:
I dont care if Mick releases 8 more sucky solo albums
I just cant bare another lame Stones record
Ditto!!!
I think that Keith just figures after this past leg of the tour...Jagger is gotten used to humiliation! |
|
Maxmeister |
quote: Sir Stonesalot wrote:
>If Mick has an entirely new batch of songs why not just make them into new Stones stuff?<
Turn Jagger solo tunes into a Stones record?
Hmmmmmmm....wait a minute. This sounds framiliar....
Yeah, they already did that once. It's called "A Bigger Bang". And it sucked.
Go Mick. Do that solo thing. And thanks for not putting the Stones "brand" on it this time.
When I started reading this thread I knew someone had to point out the obvious. It should have been everyone's first thought.
It will be interesting to see if he gave up all the "good stuff" for the ABB release or held back goodies for the solo.[lol]
Rick
|
|
pdog |
Keith could make a record if he wanted with or w/o Mick... It's pretty obvious he doesn't want or feel it. |
|
wattsup |
I am not saying ABB was a great album. I like Rock & Roll music. If anyone can name me 10 Rock albums (er CD's) they liked better than ABB in 2005 & 2006 I'd like to see your list. I just havent been real impressed with much of anything. Im willing to listen.
As far as the Stones solo efforts or playing together, play as the Stones. I like a lot of "solo songs". There are some good bits in those albums. We all know the Stone's have "caught magic in a bottle" once & hope they might do it one last time.
Sorry, just venting I usually just read these threads & leave it alone. Couldnt do it this time. |
|
glencar |
quote: Soldatti wrote:
Please, not another ABB again!
The last part is more likely.
[/quote]I'd love ABB Part 2! |
|
glencar |
quote: Mickijaggeroo wrote:
Keith is pissed at Mick cause of this, thatīs why there is no proper pressconference, just Mick.
Intriguing theory... |