ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
A Bigger Bang Tour 2006

LA Forum, Inglewood, CA - March 6, 2006
© Harold Colson aka Stoneslib
[ ROCKSOFF.ORG ] [ IORR NEWS ] [ SETLISTS 1962-2006 ] [ FORO EN ESPAÑOL ] [ BIT TORRENT TRACKER ] [ BIT TORRENT HELP ] [ BIRTHDAY'S LIST ] [ MICK JAGGER ] [ KEITHFUCIUS ] [ CHARLIE WATTS ] [ RONNIE WOOD ] [ BRIAN JONES ] [ MICK TAYLOR ] [ BILL WYMAN ] [ IAN "STU" STEWART ] [ NICKY HOPKINS ] [ MERRY CLAYTON ] [ IAN 'MAC' McLAGAN ] [ LINKS ] [ PHOTOS ] [ JIMI HENDRIX ] [ TEMPLE ] [ GUESTBOOK ] [ ADMIN ]
CHAT ROOM aka The Fun HOUSE Rest rooms last days
ROCKS OFF - The Rolling Stones Message Board
Register | Update Profile | F.A.Q. | Admin Control Panel

Topic: What do you think of the Stones' chord structure? Return to archive
2nd March 2006 05:56 AM
morocco If you were to describe the Stones' chord structures, how would you do it? What do you think the style of the Stones' chord progressions is?
2nd March 2006 06:00 AM
Daethgod Stonesy ?
2nd March 2006 06:06 AM
Jumacfly Bluesy, definitely!!
2nd March 2006 06:24 AM
IzzyStradlin Simplistic, basic.
2nd March 2006 06:27 AM
speedfreakjive Always inventive and always involving some bluesyness, or Chuck Berry influence.
I Go Wild has a brilliant chord sequence for example.
2nd March 2006 06:41 AM
Break The Spell Rough, raw, direct, in your face rock, at time bluesy, at times mellow.
2nd March 2006 08:08 AM
Jumacfly
quote:
IzzyStradlin wrote:
Simplistic, basic.



great definiton of your posting man!
2nd March 2006 09:14 AM
Break The Spell
quote:
Jumacfly wrote:


great definiton of your posting man!



Haha, that and redundant, asanine.
2nd March 2006 09:45 AM
gimmekeef All I've ever needed.......
2nd March 2006 07:23 PM
Soldatti rough Rock & roll.
3rd March 2006 12:27 AM
PeerQueer You know what - it is highly underrated. Too many people go all gaga over the Beatles multi-layered studio enhanced pop "art" music but the fact is, the Stones could pull that stuff off w/o much fuss, but the Beatles could never pull off what the Stones do - they pretended, the Stones WERE.

Simplistic...yeah, kinda like Picasso is simplistic art - though few have equaled his ability in the last 100 years. So too with the Stones.

A great fucking band that does not get near the respect for their musicianship.

I remember back in college listening to Satisfaction whilst baking on some herb and declaring to the other two sharing in my haze that the chords of Satisfaction were genious and exemplified Rock and Roll. This guy - who played in a local college band sneered and said "Shit, I could play that crap in my sleep. They ain't no Grateful Dead."

I told him that he might be able to play it - but could he INVENT the fucking chord progression - did he have the artistic talent to come up with sound that is now universally recognized within a second of hearing it.

I asked him how many songs he had written. He said a few. I asked how many times do they get played on the radio. He said none.

I told him to shut the fuck up then and get out of my house. I was ready to kick a skull in. That's how much I love my Stones!!!!!

A real buzz-killer that one. But I think he might have gotten the point.
3rd March 2006 01:19 AM
gorda
quote:
PeerQueer wrote:
You know what - it is highly underrated. Too many people go all gaga over the Beatles multi-layered studio enhanced pop "art" music but the fact is, the Stones could pull that stuff off w/o much fuss, but the Beatles could never pull off what the Stones do - they pretended, the Stones WERE.

Simplistic...yeah, kinda like Picasso is simplistic art - though few have equaled his ability in the last 100 years. So too with the Stones.

A great fucking band that does not get near the respect for their musicianship.

I remember back in college listening to Satisfaction whilst baking on some herb and declaring to the other two sharing in my haze that the chords of Satisfaction were genious and exemplified Rock and Roll. This guy - who played in a local college band sneered and said "Shit, I could play that crap in my sleep. They ain't no Grateful Dead."

I told him that he might be able to play it - but could he INVENT the fucking chord progression - did he have the artistic talent to come up with sound that is now universally recognized within a second of hearing it.

I asked him how many songs he had written. He said a few. I asked how many times do they get played on the radio. He said none.

I told him to shut the fuck up then and get out of my house. I was ready to kick a skull in. That's how much I love my Stones!!!!!

A real buzz-killer that one. But I think he might have gotten the point.



The only Grateful Dead Song, I can recognize is the one that goes "I wil survive . . ."

I once got invited to a Grateful Dead concert, and I refused. Now, I regret it. I wish I had gone.
3rd March 2006 07:44 AM
IzzyStradlin
quote:
Jumacfly wrote:


great definiton of your posting man!



Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...................
3rd March 2006 09:11 AM
Lazy Bones
quote:
gorda wrote:
The only Grateful Dead Song, I can recognize is the one that goes "I wil survive . . ."



"Touch Of Grey".

Jaxx, by the way, is our in-house Grateful Dead specialist!
[Edited by Lazy Bones]
3rd March 2006 09:13 AM
Moonisup maybe simple in structure, but they take it to a higher leavell !
3rd March 2006 10:47 AM
rollmops Many of the Rolling Stones' songs are written using the 20th century chord progression of I, IV and V. This is the harmonic vocabulary of blues and early country music. The Greatest American musical invention!!! Which led to Rock and Roll. It is a very simple structure that definitely appeals to the senses. Add a backbeat to it (thankx Charlie) and you have a kind of music that will sway you!!
But the Rolling Stones have written songs that can be called comlexe; Midnight Rambler, Monkey Man, Can't you hear me Knocking, Wild Horses etc ...
Mops
3rd March 2006 11:25 AM
Break The Spell
quote:
rollmops wrote:
Many of the Rolling Stones' songs are written using the 20th century chord progression of I, IV and V. This is the harmonic vocabulary of blues and early country music. The Greatest American musical invention!!! Which led to Rock and Roll. It is a very simple structure that definitely appeals to the senses. Add a backbeat to it (thankx Charlie) and you have a kind of music that will sway you!!
But the Rolling Stones have written songs that can be called comlexe; Midnight Rambler, Monkey Man, Can't you hear me Knocking, Wild Horses etc ...
Mops



You can also add Winter, Time Waits For No One and Moonlight Mile to the list. Continental Drift may not be complex, just unconventional.
3rd March 2006 12:09 PM
MikeyC613 Where is the complex part in Winter?
3rd March 2006 12:18 PM
nanatod
quote:
MikeyC613 wrote:
Where is the complex part in Winter?



Trying to get radio stations to play it and other songs from Goats Head Soup. Wait, trying to get radio stations other than classic rock stations to play any Stones at all.
3rd March 2006 12:34 PM
Break The Spell
quote:
nanatod wrote:


Trying to get radio stations to play it and other songs from Goats Head Soup. Wait, trying to get radio stations other than classic rock stations to play any Stones at all.



Thats the way it is here as well, their big on Macca, U2, Beatles, Billy Joel, James Taylor, Elton John and 70's one hit wonders. Its rare to hear any Stones outside of a few Hot Rocks tracks around here on the alleged classic rock station. Sad,sad,sad...
Search for information in the wet page, the archives and this board:

PicoSearch
The Rolling Stones World Tour 2005 Rolling Stones Bigger Bang Tour 2005 2006 Rolling Stones Forum - Rolling Stones Message Board - Mick Jagger - Keith Richards - Brian Jones - Charlie Watts - Ian Stewart - Stu - Bill Wyman - Mick Taylor - Ronnie Wood - Ron Wood - Rolling Stones 2005 Tour - Farewell Tour - Rolling Stones: Onstage World Tour A Bigger Bang US Tour

NEW: SEARCH ZONE:
Search for goods, you'll find the impossible collector's item!!!
Enter artist an start searching using "Power Search" (RECOMMENDED)