February 15th, 2006 12:55 PM |
|
|
Soldatti |
*Re* 193 ROLLING STONES BEST OF... JUMP BACK 6,284 +24% 5,084 707,887
US Date: 11/09/2004 - Run: *30*-52-58-65-75-93-103-105-103-98-104-115-127-152-146-122- (16 wsf)
01/01/2005: 119-116-148-126-127-130-138-152-148-122-129-132-131-150-165-187-179-161-163-161-165-151-142-155-157-169-132-168-
188-199-0-171-175-146-160-0-0-136-115-140-167-187 (55-46c wks)
Re #01: 31/12/2005 192-173 (2 wks, 57 wsf)
Re #02: 25/02/2006 193 (1 wk)
Total # of re-entries: 4
Total # of weeks: 58-46c
Total sales: 707,887 (77 wks on the market, 58 wks on top 200)
*Re* 198 ROLLING STONES BIGGER BANG 6,118 +35% 4,555 489,547
US Date: 24/09/2005 - Run: *3*-12-25-41-49-63-64-79-84-106-135-95-125-154-135- (15 wsf)
07/01/2006: 128-0-0-198-197-0-0-198 (19-16c/1 wks)
Total # of re-entries: 2
Total # of weeks: 19-16c
Total sales: 489,547 (23 wks on the market, 19 wks on top 200)
I posted the whole top 200 on IORR. |
February 15th, 2006 02:00 PM |
|
|
Mel Belli |
As JB would no doubt have noticed, ABB is bound to go platinum! |
February 15th, 2006 02:26 PM |
|
|
Break The Spell |
It's good to see BANG re-enter the charts, its kind of annoying to see people buying Jump Back and not the real albums from the 70's and 80's that the compilation represents. All those edits on that disc are annoying, just like on disc 2 of 40 Licks. |
February 15th, 2006 02:28 PM |
|
|
Mel Belli |
quote: Break The Spell wrote:
It's good to see BANG re-enter the charts, its kind of annoying to see people buying Jump Back and not the real albums from the 70's and 80's that the compilation represents. All those edits on that disc are annoying, just like on disc 2 of 40 Licks.
Why'd you have to remind me about those damn edits?! |
February 15th, 2006 02:34 PM |
|
|
Break The Spell |
quote: Mel Belli wrote:
Why'd you have to remind me about those damn edits?!
If I keep bringing it up, maybe one day they'll get a good compilation that truly does them justice, why does IORR, Beast of Burden, Emotional Rescue, Miss You, Mixed Emotions, Fool To Cry, Undercover, etc. always have to be edits. "Time Waits For no One" from Sucking is the worst victim. Same thing when the Who's "Won't Get Fooled Again" got chopped to 3 1/2 minutes. Next step, a Led Zep compilation with a 3 minute "Stairway To Heaven", cuz them solo's at the end are so annoying afterall...
[Edited by Break The Spell] |
February 15th, 2006 03:56 PM |
|
|
White House Lawn |
Those edits piss me off, too!
They should have left OFF 3 of the shitty new songs, left ON "Waiting for a Friend" and of course, left those great tunes unedited! |
February 15th, 2006 04:02 PM |
|
|
voodoopug |
quote: Soldatti wrote:
*Re* 193 ROLLING STONES BEST OF... JUMP BACK 6,284 +24% 5,084 707,887
US Date: 11/09/2004 - Run: *30*-52-58-65-75-93-103-105-103-98-104-115-127-152-146-122- (16 wsf)
01/01/2005: 119-116-148-126-127-130-138-152-148-122-129-132-131-150-165-187-179-161-163-161-165-151-142-155-157-169-132-168-
188-199-0-171-175-146-160-0-0-136-115-140-167-187 (55-46c wks)
Re #01: 31/12/2005 192-173 (2 wks, 57 wsf)
Re #02: 25/02/2006 193 (1 wk)
Total # of re-entries: 4
Total # of weeks: 58-46c
Total sales: 707,887 (77 wks on the market, 58 wks on top 200)
*Re* 198 ROLLING STONES BIGGER BANG 6,118 +35% 4,555 489,547
US Date: 24/09/2005 - Run: *3*-12-25-41-49-63-64-79-84-106-135-95-125-154-135- (15 wsf)
07/01/2006: 128-0-0-198-197-0-0-198 (19-16c/1 wks)
Total # of re-entries: 2
Total # of weeks: 19-16c
Total sales: 489,547 (23 wks on the market, 19 wks on top 200)
I posted the whole top 200 on IORR.
As I once again, accurately predicted, Jump Back and ABB shall see nice bumps (I suspect 40 Licks and Hot Rocks also got a bump) while Rarities was not affected! |
February 15th, 2006 04:03 PM |
|
|
Break The Spell |
quote: White House Lawn wrote:
Those edits piss me off, too!
They should have left OFF 3 of the shitty new songs, left ON "Waiting for a Friend" and of course, left those great tunes unedited!
Exactly, the only new song they needed was "Don't Stop" on there, replace the other three with "Heartbreaker", "Waiting On A Friend" and "She's So Cold", there would be enough room then for no edits and it would be a much better track listing on disk 2 as well. |
February 15th, 2006 04:04 PM |
|
|
Saint Sway |
I am glad that their awesome SB performance has caused a slight surge in their record sales. They deserve better than having to try and support their families strictly off of their touring income.
|
February 15th, 2006 04:08 PM |
|
|
IzzyStradlin |
Can someone explain to me how the sales of this album (good or bad) makes it better (or worse)?
It is what it is............ very average.....at best. |
February 15th, 2006 04:20 PM |
|
|
Break The Spell |
quote: Saint Sway wrote:
I am glad that their awesome SB performance has caused a slight surge in their record sales. They deserve better than having to try and support their families strictly off of their touring income.
Whats interesting is the Superbowl performance was most people's first taste of A Bigger Bang, the party I was at people were like wow, these guys have a new album?? I played them parts of it and they seemed to like it, they need better promotion when it comes to albums, they have the touring part down just fine. |
February 15th, 2006 04:51 PM |
|
|
voodoopug |
quote: IzzyStradlin wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the sales of this album (good or bad) makes it better (or worse)?
It is what it is............ very average.....at best.
We (true stones fans) must only accept the best performance possible, be it a live show or album sales. ABB has been regarded by many here and on other boards to be a fine effort. I personally think it is better than many of their other albums (particularly everything since Tattoo You aside from Voodoo Lounge), and not at the same level as others.
More album sales will motivate the band to continue as a working band.
You heard it here! |
February 15th, 2006 06:38 PM |
|
|
Soldatti |
quote: Break The Spell wrote:
they need better promotion when it comes to albums, they have the touring part down just fine.
I blame to Virgin, they don't give a shit or don't have an idea. Every act that flopped with Virgin a few years back, are selling loads of copies now with other label (Green Day, Mariah Carey, Rod Stewart...) |
February 15th, 2006 07:00 PM |
|
|
glencar |
quote: Break The Spell wrote:
Exactly, the only new song they needed was "Don't Stop" on there, replace the other three with "Heartbreaker", "Waiting On A Friend" and "She's So Cold", there would be enough room then for no edits and it would be a much better track listing on disk 2 as well.
Simply superb posting! |
February 15th, 2006 07:01 PM |
|
|
glencar |
quote: IzzyStradlin wrote:
Can someone explain to me how the sales of this album (good or bad) makes it better (or worse)?
It is what it is............ very average.....at best.
Bad posting! |
February 16th, 2006 06:55 AM |
|
|
corgi37 |
Izzy does not deserve applause for 100 posts.
Light my fire & Wont get fooled again edits are as annoying as heard it through the grapevine edit. |
February 16th, 2006 10:57 AM |
|
|
Ihavelotsajam |
quote: Break The Spell wrote:
Whats interesting is the Superbowl performance was most people's first taste of A Bigger Bang, the party I was at people were like wow, these guys have a new album?? I played them parts of it and they seemed to like it, they need better promotion when it comes to albums, they have the touring part down just fine.
Absolutely nobody I know is aware of ABB, and we're talking some people who can even name many of their individual albums. The rest downloaded ABB online (maybe because it's free, maybe not to be seen in a store buying it). |
February 16th, 2006 11:00 AM |
|
|
glencar |
Don't you have to pay for those downloads? Or is it one of those free services like kazaa? |
February 16th, 2006 11:02 AM |
|
|
Ihavelotsajam |
quote: glencar wrote:
Don't you have to pay for those downloads? Or is it one of those free services like kazaa?
Free |
February 16th, 2006 11:17 AM |
|
|
egon |
I'd like to state once more that i bought ABB twice.
In france we call that being "a conard".
|
February 16th, 2006 11:17 AM |
|
|
glencar |
I bought it thrice! |
February 16th, 2006 11:19 AM |
|
|
egon |
tu est con toi! |
February 16th, 2006 11:19 AM |
|
|
glencar |
LOL It still hasn't gone gold here yet! |
February 16th, 2006 11:22 AM |
|
|
egon |
maybe you and I should buy a few more then? |
February 16th, 2006 11:26 AM |
|
|
glencar |
I bought about a dozen copies of Licks & gave them away as gifts. Let Virgin do the heavy lifting this year. |
February 16th, 2006 11:31 AM |
|
|
jb |
ABB still not Gold!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
February 16th, 2006 11:33 AM |
|
|
glencar |
Nope. It should do that in 2 weeks but it's been a long road. It's a shame because it's a fine collection. |
February 16th, 2006 11:34 AM |
|
|
Soldatti |
Full summary:
Top 200 Albums
#193 Jump Back (re-entry)
#198 A Bigger Bang (re-entry)
Top 40 Videos
#39 Four Flicks (re-entry)
http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?f=Billboard+Comprehensive+Music+Videos&pageNumber=Top+11-40&g=Videos
Hot Dance Singles
#21 Rain Fall Down
http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?f=Hot+Dance+Club+Play&pageNumber=Top+11-25&g=Singles |
February 16th, 2006 11:37 AM |
|
|
jb |
70, 012 compared to over 500k for U2 and over 900k for LZ!!!!! |
February 16th, 2006 11:37 AM |
|
|
glencar |
This is especially depressing:
http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?g=Singles&f=The+Billboard+Hot+100 |