| February 7th, 2006 06:24 PM |
|
|
| maumau |
survey
"how would you rate a poll where you can vote as many times as you like?"
a
b
c
d
e
F
yes they were effing great!
|
| February 8th, 2006 06:31 AM |
|
|
| IzzyStradlin |
quote:
Saint Sway wrote:
Izzy Stradlin would of crapped his pants on that stage.
I dont think they looked tired at all. Plenty of energy.
I love Izzy. But when was the last time he left his house?
What does Izzy Stradlin have to do with the fact the Stones sucked out loud, you nipplead. Get over it, they are done. If you can't see it, you're in denial or just a retard.............or both. My money's on the latter. |
| February 8th, 2006 06:33 AM |
|
|
| IzzyStradlin |
quote:
Jumacfly wrote:
Those bashers are quite pathetic.
the Stones were good,of course they did a few mistakes, Satisfation had sloppy little parts but listen when Charlie brings them back in the good tempo it's a great RNR moment!!
SMU and rough had great moments, even if the second one sounds more and more like an avatar of you got me rocking..and if Jagger's voice had little problems, this guy is still the most amazing performer of RNR.
some people should consider that 72 is over...
In 2006 the Stones still give their best and don't lie to their audience...Im not very fan of the current tour but let's face that they did a great performance.
this poll is non sense, and only reflect the general bad tastes in music of today's world, formated between stoooopid RNB ala 15 cent or boring metal gangs with black painted nails....
I even forgotten the results!!
You are right........some people should consider that 72 is over and it has been for...........34 years. |
| February 8th, 2006 07:19 AM |
|
|
| Jumacfly |
quote:
IzzyStradlin wrote:
You are right........some people should consider that 72 is over and it has been for...........34 years.
you are good in mathematics!
|
| February 8th, 2006 09:00 AM |
|
|
| Ihavelotsajam |
quote:
Jumacfly wrote:
you are good in mathematics!
I'm enjoying Izzy's presence on this board-- that's one mofo who is certainly not indifferent! |
| February 9th, 2006 12:03 AM |
|
|
| PeerQueer |
quote:
IzzyStradlin wrote:
What does Izzy Stradlin have to do with the fact the Stones sucked out loud, you nipplead. Get over it, they are done. If you can't see it, you're in denial or just a retard.............or both. My money's on the latter.
_____
And my cock is in your ass - so shut the fuck up and hold still...it's all your good for with such anti-Stones drivel as this...
P.S. No reach-a-round for you!
|
| February 9th, 2006 01:04 AM |
|
|
| Brainbell Jangler |
quote:
jb wrote:
Don't waste your time..these are clearly what are called "flame" threadfs to illicit reaction...I know about these things.
[Edited by jb]
"to illicit reaction"? Shouldn't that be "to elicit reaction"? Or perhaps you meant "to elicit an illicit reaction"?
And tracey, make that a really splintery sharp stick. |
| February 9th, 2006 07:06 AM |
|
|
| IzzyStradlin |
quote:
PeerQueer wrote:
_____
And my cock is in your ass - so shut the fuck up and hold still...it's all your good for with such anti-Stones drivel as this...
P.S. No reach-a-round for you!
That means a lot coming from a sperm burper. |
| February 9th, 2006 05:52 PM |
|
|
| PeerQueer |
quote:
IzzyStradlin wrote:
That means a lot coming from a sperm burper.
____
You must get a fair share of constipated greetings - you say hello but people don't give a shit. |
| February 9th, 2006 10:12 PM |
|
|
| IzzyStradlin |
quote:
PeerQueer wrote:
____
You must get a fair share of constipated greetings - you say hello but people don't give a shit.
Ummm. Ya, good one. |
| February 9th, 2006 10:15 PM |
|
|
| PeerQueer |
quote:
IzzyStradlin wrote:
Ummm. Ya, good one.
______
Right back atcha!
P.S. - Lose some weight! You look disgraceful! |
